Literature DB >> 18567269

Reduced blocking as a result of increasing the number of blocking cues.

James E Witnauer1, Gonzalo P Urcelay, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Weak behavioral control (blocking) occurs when a target stimulus (X) is paired with an outcome in the presence of a well-established signal for the outcome (i.e., a blocking stimulus). Conventional Pavlovian conditioning theories explain this effect by asserting that a discrepancy between expected and experienced outcomes is necessary for learning about X and that no such discrepancy exists in blocking situations. These theories anticipate that the effect of additional well-established signals for the unconditioned stimulus (US) should be additive. In two conditioned barpress suppression experiments using rats as subjects, the opposite result was observed. Experiment 1 provided evidence that blocking was reduced when two blocking stimuli were present during X-US pairings relative to when one blocking stimulus was present. Experiment 2 elaborated on the mechanisms underlying the observations in Experiment 1, while explaining the discrepancy between the results of Experiment 1 and prior reports of the additivity of blocking stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567269      PMCID: PMC2657804          DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

2.  Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  E F Kremer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1978-01

5.  Blocking but not conditioned inhibition results when an added stimulus is reinforced in compound with multiple pretrained stimuli.

Authors:  T R Schachtman; W J Kasprow; M A Chee; R R Miller
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1985
  5 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  A One-System Theory Which is Not Propositional.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Extinction with multiple excitors.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Gonzalo Miguez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  Methods of comparing associative models and an application to retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ryan Hutchings; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Protection from latent inhibition provided by a conditioned inhibitor.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Daniel S Wheeler; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

7.  Conditioned suppression is an inverted-U function of footshock intensity.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Overexpectation and trial massing.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

Review 9.  Retrospective revaluation: The phenomenon and its theoretical implications.

Authors:  Ralph R Miller; James E Witnauer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.777

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.