Literature DB >> 21264564

Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

James E Witnauer1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

In a Pavlovian conditioning situation, an initially neutral stimulus may be made excitatory by nonreinforced presentations in compound with an established conditioned excitor [i.e., second-order conditioning (SOC)]. The established excitor may be either a punctate cue or the training context. In four conditioned suppression experiments using rats, we investigated whether SOC phenomena parallel other cue interaction effects. In Experiment 1, we found that the response potential of a target stimulus was directly related to the intertrial interval when SOC was mediated by a punctate cue, and inversely related to the intertrial interval when SOC was mediated by the training context. Experiment 2 demonstrated that punctate- and context-mediated SOC are oppositely affected by posttraining context extinction, and Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated that context- and punctate-mediated SOC are differentially affected by conditioned stimulus (Experiment 3) and unconditioned stimulus (Experiment 4) preexposure treatments. These findings parallel phenomena in conditioned inhibition and cue competition situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264564     DOI: 10.1007/s13420-010-0002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  21 in total

1.  Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus.

Authors:  P C Holland; R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-01

2.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

3.  The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

4.  Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

5.  Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

6.  Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Counteraction between two kinds of conditioned inhibition training.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

9.  Reduced blocking as a result of increasing the number of blocking cues.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

10.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  A P Blaisdell; A S Bristol; L M Gunther; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  The Conditions under Which Consolidation of Serial-Order Conditioned Fear Requires De Novo Protein Synthesis in the Basolateral Amygdala Complex.

Authors:  Matthew J Williams-Spooner; R Frederick Westbrook; Nathan M Holmes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  The error in total error reduction.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  The Opioid Receptor Antagonist Naloxone Enhances First-Order Fear Conditioning, Second-Order Fear Conditioning and Sensory Preconditioning in Rats.

Authors:  Robine M L Michalscheck; Dana M Leidl; R Frederick Westbrook; Nathan M Holmes
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.