Literature DB >> 26342855

Retrospective revaluation: The phenomenon and its theoretical implications.

Ralph R Miller1, James E Witnauer2.   

Abstract

Retrospective revaluation refers to an increase (or decrease) in responding to conditioned stimulus (CS X) as a result of decreasing (or increasing) the associative strength of another CS (A) with respect to the unconditioned stimulus (i.e., A-US) that was previously trained in compound with the target CS (e.g., AX-US or just AX). We discuss the conditions under which retrospective revaluation phenomena are most apt to be observed and their implications for various models of learning that are able to account for retrospective revaluation (e.g., Dickinson and Burke, 1996; Miller and Matzel, 1988; Van Hamme and Wasserman, 1994). Although retroactive revaluation is relatively parameter specific, it is seen to be a reliable phenomenon observed across many tasks and species. As it is not anticipated by many conventional models of learning (e.g., Rescorla and Wagner, 1972), it serves as a critical benchmark for evaluating traditional and newer models.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Counteraction in cue competition; Learning-performance distinction; Recovery from cue competition; Retrospective revaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26342855      PMCID: PMC4729633          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  49 in total

1.  Unequal associative changes when excitors and neutral stimuli are conditioned in compound.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-02

2.  Retrospective revaluation in humans: learning or memory?

Authors:  M E Le Pelley; I P McLaren
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-11

Review 3.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Enhancement of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition achieved by posttraining inflation of the training excitor.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Amundson; Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2005-08-01

5.  Failure of retrospective revaluation to influence blocking.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; John M Pearce; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

6.  Effect of relative stimulus validity: learning or performance deficit?

Authors:  R P Cole; R C Barnet; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-10

7.  Elemental representation and configural mappings: combining elemental and configural theories of associative learning.

Authors:  I P L McLaren; C L Forrest; R P McLaren
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.

Authors:  Chris J Mitchell; Asawari Killedar; Peter F Lovibond
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-10

Review 9.  The error in total error reduction.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  [Second-order retrospective revaluation in human contingency learning].

Authors:  Keitaro Numata; Tsuneo Shimazaki
Journal:  Shinrigaku Kenkyu       Date:  2009-04
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Methods of comparing associative models and an application to retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ryan Hutchings; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Believing in dopamine.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Naoshige Uchida
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Associative learning and timing.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-17

4.  Elemental and configural threat learning bias extinction generalization.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Goldfarb; Tahj Blow; Joseph E Dunsmoor; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  A retrieval-specific mechanism of adaptive forgetting in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  Pedro Bekinschtein; Noelia V Weisstaub; Francisco Gallo; Maria Renner; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.