Literature DB >> 621465

The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.

E F Kremer.   

Abstract

This series of experiments demonstrated that compound conditioned stimuli (CSs) highly conditioned in isolation lose conditioned response strength when compound-CS-unconditioned stimulus (US) pairings are given. This loss in conditioned responding was a positive function of the number of compound-CS-US pairings and was greater for the more salient stimulus. Finally, if a previously neutral stimulus was compounded with two previously conditioned cues, the neutral stimulus could acquire conditioned inhibitory properties with only compound-CS-US pairings. These results provide support for some aspects of the Rescorla-Wagner model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 621465     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.4.1.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  23 in total

Review 1.  The S-R information stream: where's the filter?

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

Review 2.  The Origins and Organization of Vertebrate Pavlovian Conditioning.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental learning.

Authors:  Travis P Todd; Drina Vurbic; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Correction of response error versus stimulus error in the extinction of discriminated operant learning.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Eric A Thrailkill; Sydney Trask; Felipe Alfaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Blocking, unblocking, and overexpectation in autoshaping with pigeons.

Authors:  Y Khallad; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Recency-to-primacy shift in cue competition.

Authors:  Olga Lipatova; Daniel S Wheeler; Miguel A Vadillo; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-10

8.  Renewal after overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference.

Authors:  Tom Beckers; Ralph R Miller; Jan De Houwer; Kouji Urushihara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

Review 10.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.