Literature DB >> 19364228

Overexpectation and trial massing.

Heather T Sissons1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to examine the interaction of overexpectation treatment and trial massing using a Pavlovian fear conditioning procedure with rats. In first-order conditioning, Experiment 1 found the overexpectation effect (i.e., decreased conditioned responding to a cue after compound training when the elements were previously reinforced), the trial spacing effect (i.e., decreased responding to a cue when reinforced trials are massed), and a counteraction between overexpectation treatment and trial massing (i.e., an alleviation of the decrement in responding seen with overexpectation treatment or trial massing alone when the two treatments are conjointly administered). Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 with the critical treatments embedded within a sensory preconditioning preparation. The overexpectation effect, the trial spacing effect, and the mutual counteraction of overexpectation treatment and trial massing all proved significant. In Experiment 3, either the nontarget conditioned stimulus of overexpectation treatment or the excitatory context resulting from trial massing was extinguished. Results are best explained by the extended comparator hypothesis (J. C. Denniston, H. I. Savastano, & R. R. Miller, 2001). Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19364228      PMCID: PMC2841740          DOI: 10.1037/a0013426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  18 in total

1.  Theoretical mechanisms underlying the trial-spacing effect in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  P B Barela
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-04

2.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.

Authors:  Z ANNAU; L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-08

3.  The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

4.  Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure.

Authors:  Ian Shevill; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-10

5.  Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

6.  Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

7.  Stimulus salience and retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  Mimi Liljeholm; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-10

8.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  A P Blaisdell; A S Bristol; L M Gunther; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07

9.  Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.

Authors:  A Dickinson; J Burke
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1996-02

10.  Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment.

Authors:  R R Miller; H Matute
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Extinction with multiple excitors.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Gonzalo Miguez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Temporal and spatial contiguity are necessary for competition between events.

Authors:  Estibaliz Herrera; José A Alcalá; Toru Tazumi; Matthew G Buckley; José Prados; Gonzalo P Urcelay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Agency rescues competition for credit assignment among predictive cues from adverse learning conditions.

Authors:  Mihwa Kang; Ingrid Reverte; Stephen Volz; Keith Kaufman; Salvatore Fevola; Anna Matarazzo; Fahd H Alhazmi; Inmaculada Marquez; Mihaela D Iordanova; Guillem R Esber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Contrasting the overexpectation and extinction effects.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Conditioned suppression is an inverted-U function of footshock intensity.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.