Literature DB >> 23231306

Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.

Zongyi Gong1, Kelly Klanian, Tushita Patel, Olivia Sullivan, Mark B Williams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We are developing a dual modality tomosynthesis breast scanner in which x-ray transmission tomosynthesis and gamma emission tomosynthesis are performed sequentially with the breast in a common configuration. In both modalities projection data are obtained over an angular range of less than 180° from one side of the mildly compressed breast resulting in incomplete and asymmetrical sampling. The objective of this work is to implement and evaluate a maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis (GEBT).
METHODS: A combination of Monte Carlo simulations and phantom experiments was used to test the MLEM algorithm for GEBT. The algorithm utilizes prior information obtained from the x-ray breast tomosynthesis scan to partially compensate for the incomplete angular sampling and to perform attenuation correction (AC) and resolution recovery (RR). System spatial resolution, image artifacts, lesion contrast, and signal to noise ratio (SNR) were measured as image quality figures of merit. To test the robustness of the reconstruction algorithm and to assess the relative impacts of correction techniques with changing angular range, simulations and experiments were both performed using acquisition angular ranges of 45°, 90° and 135°. For comparison, a single projection containing the same total number of counts as the full GEBT scan was also obtained to simulate planar breast scintigraphy.
RESULTS: The in-plane spatial resolution of the reconstructed GEBT images is independent of source position within the reconstructed volume and independent of acquisition angular range. For 45° acquisitions, spatial resolution in the depth dimension (the direction of breast compression) is degraded with increasing source depth (increasing distance from the collimator surface). Increasing the acquisition angular range from 45° to 135° both greatly reduces this depth dependence and improves the average depth dimension resolution from 10.8 to 4.8 mm. The 135° acquisition results in a near-isotropic, spatially uniform 3D resolution of approximately 4.3 mm full width at half maximum. Background nonuniformity (cupping) artifacts arise primarily from angular incompleteness for small angular range acquisition but primarily from gamma ray attenuation at larger angular range. However, background artifacts can be largely eliminated if both prior information regularization and AC are applied. An artificial decrease in lesion voxel value with increasing lesion depth can also be substantially reduced through a combination of AC and RR. In experiments using compressible gelatin breast phantoms, lesion contrast and SNR are about 2.6-8.8 times and 2.3-5.6 times higher, respectively, in GEBT than in planar breast scintigraphy depending on the acquisition angle, the gamma camera trajectory, and the lesion location. In addition, the strong reduction in lesion contrast and SNR with increasing lesion depth that is observed in planar breast scintigraphy can be largely overcome in GEBT.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated a promising EM-based reconstruction scheme for use in GEBT. Compared to planar breast scintigraphy GEBT provides superior and less position-dependent lesion contrast, lesion SNR, and spatial resolution as well as more accurate quantification of lesion-to-background activity concentration ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231306      PMCID: PMC3523572          DOI: 10.1118/1.4764480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  Dual-modality breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Patricia G Judy; Spencer Gunn; Stanislaw Majewski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Aili K Bloomquist; Michael P Kempston; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Performance of dedicated emission mammotomography for various breast shapes and sizes.

Authors:  C N Brzymialkiewicz; M P Tornai; R L McKinley; S J Cutler; J E Bowsher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Stephen W Phillips; Dana H Whaley; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; R Carson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Steinar Thoresen; Steinar Tretli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Quantification of lesion size, depth, and uptake using a dual-head molecular breast imaging system.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Breast-specific gamma-imaging: molecular imaging of the breast using 99mTc-sestamibi and a small-field-of-view gamma-camera.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jones; Trinh D Phan; Deborah A Blanchard; Abbe Miley
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2009-11-13

10.  Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Stephen Taplin; Linn Abraham; William E Barlow; Joshua J Fenton; Eric A Berns; Patricia A Carney; Gary R Cutter; Edward A Sickles; D'Orsi Carl; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  1 in total

1.  Molecular Breast Imaging using Synthetic Projections from High-Purity Germanium Detectors: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Desmond Campbell; Todd Peterson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.