Literature DB >> 18537389

Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task.

Antje Ihlefeld1, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

When listening selectively to one talker in a two-talker environment, performance generally improves with spatial separation of the sources. The current study explores the role of spatial separation in divided listening, when listeners reported both of two simultaneous messages processed to have little spectral overlap (limiting "energetic masking" between the messages). One message was presented at a fixed level, while the other message level varied from equal to 40 dB less than that of the fixed-level message. Results demonstrate that spatial separation of the competing messages improved divided-listening performance. Most errors occurred because listeners failed to report the content of the less-intense talker. Moreover, performance generally improved as the broadband energy ratio of the variable-level to the fixed-level talker increased. The error patterns suggest that spatial separation improves the intelligibility of the less-intense talker by improving the ability to (1) hear portions of the signal that would otherwise be masked, (2) segregate the two talkers properly into separate perceptual streams, and (3) selectively focus attention on the less-intense talker. Spatial configuration did not noticeably affect the ability to report the more-intense talker, suggesting that it was processed differently than the less-intense talker, which was actively attended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18537389      PMCID: PMC9014250          DOI: 10.1121/1.2904825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Psychometric functions for informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Michael R Callahan; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Across-ear interference from parametrically degraded synthetic speech signals in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson; Christopher J Darwin; Tanya L Arbogast; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The advantage of knowing where to listen.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Improvement of hearing ability by directional information.

Authors:  M Ebata; T Sone; T Nimura
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  16 in total

1.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory attention strategy depends on target linguistic properties and spatial configuration.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceiving sequential dependencies in auditory streams.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Eric R Thompson; Virginia Best; Gregory H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical Influences on Errors in Masked Speech Perception in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Auditory spatial attention representations in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Lingqiang Kong; Samantha W Michalka; Maya L Rosen; Summer L Sheremata; Jascha D Swisher; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; David C Somers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Bobby E Gibbs; Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  The impact of noise and hearing loss on the processing of simultaneous sentences.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

9.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Decreased ability in the segregation of dynamically changing vowel-analog streams: a factor in the age-related cocktail-party deficit?

Authors:  Pierre Divenyi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.