Literature DB >> 22160754

Effects of the rate of formant-frequency variation on the grouping of formants in speech perception.

Robert J Summers1, Peter J Bailey2, Brian Roberts3.   

Abstract

How speech is separated perceptually from other speech remains poorly understood. Recent research suggests that the ability of an extraneous formant to impair intelligibility depends on the modulation of its frequency, but not its amplitude, contour. This study further examined the effect of formant-frequency variation on intelligibility by manipulating the rate of formant-frequency change. Target sentences were synthetic three-formant (F1 + F2 + F3) analogues of natural utterances. Perceptual organization was probed by presenting stimuli dichotically (F1 + F2C + F3C; F2 + F3), where F2C + F3C constitute a competitor for F2 and F3 that listeners must reject to optimize recognition. Competitors were derived using formant-frequency contours extracted from extended passages spoken by the same talker and processed to alter the rate of formant-frequency variation, such that rate scale factors relative to the target sentences were 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 (0 = constant frequencies). Competitor amplitude contours were either constant, or time-reversed and rate-adjusted in parallel with the frequency contour. Adding a competitor typically reduced intelligibility; this reduction increased with competitor rate until the rate was at least twice that of the target sentences. Similarity in the results for the two amplitude conditions confirmed that formant amplitude contours do not influence across-formant grouping. The findings indicate that competitor efficacy is not tuned to the rate of the target sentences; most probably, it depends primarily on the overall rate of frequency variation in the competitor formants. This suggests that, when segregating the speech of concurrent talkers, differences in speech rate may not be a significant cue for across-frequency grouping of formants.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22160754      PMCID: PMC3298615          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0307-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  33 in total

1.  Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate.

Authors:  R J Van Son; L C Pols
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Letter: Dichotic release from masking for speech.

Authors:  T C Rand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of glottal pulse shape on the quality of natural vowels.

Authors:  A E Rosenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Intelligibility of time-expanded speech with normally hearing and elderly subjects.

Authors:  E W Korabic; B A Freeman; G T Church
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1978 Mar-Apr

5.  Dichotic and monotic masking of CV's by CV second formants with different transition starting values.

Authors:  R J Porter; R G Whittaker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mechanism in the control of speech rate.

Authors:  T Gay
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Intelligibility of time-compressed sentential stimuli.

Authors:  D S Beasley; G W Bratt; W F Rintelmann
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1980-12

9.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

10.  Algorithms for separating the speech of interfering talkers: evaluations with voiced sentences, and normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R J Stubbs; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acoustic source characteristics, across-formant integration, and speech intelligibility under competitive conditions.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Formant-frequency variation and informational masking of speech by extraneous formants: evidence against dynamic and speech-specific acoustical constraints.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.