Literature DB >> 23556599

Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Andrew H Schwartz1, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

Many hearing aids introduce compressive gain to accommodate the reduced dynamic range that often accompanies hearing loss. However, natural sounds produce complicated temporal dynamics in hearing aid compression, as gain is driven by whichever source dominates at a given moment. Moreover, independent compression at the two ears can introduce fluctuations in interaural level differences (ILDs) important for spatial perception. While independent compression can interfere with spatial perception of sound, it does not always interfere with localization accuracy or speech identification. Here, normal-hearing listeners reported a target message played simultaneously with two spatially separated masker messages. We measured the amount of spatial separation required between the target and maskers for subjects to perform at threshold in this task. Fast, syllabic compression that was independent at the two ears increased the required spatial separation, but linking the compressors to provide identical gain to both ears (preserving ILDs) restored much of the deficit caused by fast, independent compression. Effects were less clear for slower compression. Percent-correct performance was lower with independent compression, but only for small spatial separations. These results may help explain differences in previous reports of the effect of compression on spatial perception of sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556599      PMCID: PMC3631248          DOI: 10.1121/1.4794386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.

Authors:  J F Culling; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; K Ter-Horst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of dynamic compression on directional hearing in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  Sharbal Musa-Shufani; Martin Walger; Hasso von Wedel; Hartmut Meister
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Adapting to supernormal auditory localization cues. I. Bias and resolution.

Authors:  B G Shinn-Cunningham; N I Durlach; R M Held
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Compression and its effect on the speech signal.

Authors:  J Verschuure; A J Maas; E Stikvoort; R M de Jong; A Goedegebure; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Onset dominance in lateralization.

Authors:  R L Freyman; P M Zurek; U Balakrishnan; Y C Chiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A K Nabelek; J M Pickett
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1974-12

10.  The extent to which a position-based explanation accounts for binaural release from informational masking.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Head Shadow, Summation, and Squelch in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users With Linked Automatic Gain Controls.

Authors:  Taylor A Bakal; Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Chen Chen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 4.  How neuroscience relates to hearing aid amplification.

Authors:  K L Tremblay; C W Miller
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-18

5.  A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Joshua S Stohl; Robert D Wolford; Reinhold Schatzer; Blake S Wilson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of Bilateral Automatic Gain Control Synchronization in Cochlear Implants With and Without Head Movements: Sound Source Localization in the Frontal Hemifield.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling; Chen Chen; William A Yost; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Francisco A Rodriguez; Cory D F Portnuff; Matthew J Goupell; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.