Literature DB >> 18488657

Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects.

Won Mok Shim1, George A Alvarez, Yuhong V Jiang.   

Abstract

Humans are limited in their ability to maintain multiple attentional foci. In attentive tracking of moving objects, performance declines as the number of tracked targets increases. Previous studies have interpreted such reduction in terms of a limit in the number of attentional foci. However, increasing the number of targets usually reduces spatial separation among different targets. In this study, we examine the role of target spatial separation in maintaining multiple attentional foci. Results from a multiple-object tracking task show that tracking accuracy deteriorates as the spatial separation between targets decreases. We propose that local interaction between nearby attentional foci modulates the resolution of attention, and that capacity limitation from attentive tracking originates in part from limitations in maintaining critical spacing among multiple attentional foci. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that tracking performance is limited not primarily by a number of locations, but by factors such as the spacing and speed of the targets and distractors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18488657      PMCID: PMC2621007          DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Evidence for split attentional foci.

Authors:  E Awh; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations.

Authors:  D O Bahcall; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item.

Authors:  Florin Cutzu; John K Tsotsos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

9.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; P De Weerd; M A Pinsk; M I Elizondo; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  30 in total

1.  Small Subitizing Range in People with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Kirsten O'Hearn; James E Hoffman; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-03

2.  EEG correlates of attentional load during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Heather Sternshein; Yigal Agam; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  S L Franconeri; J Y Lin; Z W Pylyshyn; B Fisher; J T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

4.  Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-07

5.  Emotional cues and social anxiety resolve ambiguous perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmet Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Behavioral dynamics and neural grounding of a dynamic field theory of multi-object tracking.

Authors:  J P Spencer; K Barich; J Goldberg; S Perone
Journal:  J Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Hierarchical structure is employed by humans during visual motion perception.

Authors:  Johannes Bill; Hrag Pailian; Samuel J Gershman; Jan Drugowitsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  The role of visual working memory in attentive tracking of unique objects.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.