Literature DB >> 29536149

Emotional cues and social anxiety resolve ambiguous perception of biological motion.

Hörmet Yiltiz1,2, Lihan Chen3,4.   

Abstract

Perceptions of ambiguous biological motion are modulated by different individual cognitive abilities (such as inhibition and empathy) and emotional states (such as anxiety). This study explored facing-the-viewer bias (FTV) in perceiving ambiguous directions of biological motion, and investigated whether task-irrelevant simultaneous face emotional cues in the background and the individual social anxiety traits could affect FTV. We found that facial motion cues as background affect sociobiologically relevant scenarios, including biological motion, but not non-biological situations (conveyed through random dot motion). Individuals with high anxiety traits demonstrated a more dominant FTV bias than individuals with low anxiety traits. Ensemble coding-like processing of task-irrelevant multiple emotional cues could magnify the facing-the-viewer bias than did in the single emotional cue. Overall, those findings suggest a correlation between high-level emotional processing and high-level motion perception (subjective to attentional control) contributes to facing-the-viewer bias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambiguity; Biological motion; Emotion; Ensemble coding; Facing-the-viewer bias; Social anxiety; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29536149     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5233-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  62 in total

1.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Gender recognition from point-light walkers.

Authors:  Frank E Pollick; Jim W Kay; Katrin Heim; Rebecca Stringer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Perception of biological motion.

Authors:  V Ahlström; R Blake; U Ahlström
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

Authors:  C MacLeod; A Mathews; P Tata
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1986-02

5.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification.

Authors:  D M Levi; S A Klein; A P Aitsebaomo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor.

Authors:  Hanako Ikeda; Randolph Blake; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird.

Authors:  Simon Hunt; Jason Low; K C Burns
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Humans use summary statistics to perceive auditory sequences.

Authors:  Elise A Piazza; Timothy D Sweeny; David Wessel; Michael A Silver; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-06-12

10.  Perception of biological motion in parietal patients.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Patrick Cavanagh; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.