Literature DB >> 10811179

Evidence for split attentional foci.

E Awh1, H Pashler.   

Abstract

A partial report procedure was used to test the ability of observers to split attention over noncontiguous locations. Observers reported the identity of 2 targets that appeared within a 5 x 5 stimulus array, and cues (validity = 80%) informed them of the 2 most likely target locations. On invalid trials, 1 of the targets appeared directly in between the cued locations. Experiments 1, 1a, and 2 showed a strong accuracy advantage at cued locations compared with intervening ones. This effect was larger when the cues were arranged horizontally rather than vertically. Experiment 3 suggests that this effect of cue orientation reflects an advantage for processing targets that appear in different hemifields. Experiments 4 and 4a suggest that the primary mechanism supporting the flexible deployment of spatial attention is the suppression of interference from stimuli at unattended locations.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10811179     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  64 in total

1.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.

Authors:  M Kathryn Bleckley; Francis T Durso; Jerry M Crutchfield; Randall W Engle; Maya M Khanna
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Cognitive Control Network Contributions to Memory-Guided Visual Attention.

Authors:  Maya L Rosen; Chantal E Stern; Samantha W Michalka; Kathryn J Devaney; David C Somers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection.

Authors:  G Rowe; J B Hirsh; A K Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The time it takes to switch attention.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

6.  Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: evidence from the attentional blink.

Authors:  Jun-Ichiro Kawahara; Yuki Yamada
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

7.  Attentional prioritization to contextually new objects.

Authors:  Hirokazu Ogawa; Takatsune Kumada
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

8.  The blinking spotlight of attention.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Thomas Carlson; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Keisuke Fukuda; Lisa M May; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.