Literature DB >> 12536142

The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item.

Florin Cutzu1, John K Tsotsos.   

Abstract

The selective tuning model [Artif. Intell. 78 (1995) 507] is a neurobiologically plausible neural network model of visual attention. One of its key predictions is that to simultaneously solve the problems of convergence of neural input and selection of attended items, the portions of the visual neural network that process an attended stimulus must be surrounded by inhibition. To test this hypothesis, we mapped the attentional field around an attended location in a matching task where the subject's attention was directed to a cued target while the distance of a probe item to the target was varied systematically. The main result was that accuracy increased with inter-target separation. The observed pattern of variation of accuracy with distance provided strong evidence in favor of the critical prediction of the model that attention is actively inhibited in the immediate vicinity of an attended location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12536142     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00491-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  51 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry.

Authors:  Antje Kraft; Jasper Roehmel; Manuel C Olma; Sein Schmidt; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process.

Authors:  Sabine Kastner; Mark A Pinsk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.

Authors:  J-M Hopf; C N Boehler; S J Luck; J K Tsotsos; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nonspatial attributes of stimuli can influence spatial limitations of attentional control.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Lyndsey K Lanagan-Leitzel; Peggy Chen; Rose Halterman; Elisabeth M Fine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-04

6.  Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection.

Authors:  Thomas A Carlson; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Attentional modulation of visual responses by flexible input gain.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing.

Authors:  Kelly S Steelman-Allen; Jason S McCarley; Jeffrey R W Mounts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

Review 9.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 10.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.