Literature DB >> 11426231

Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

L Parkes1, J Lund, A Angelucci, J A Solomon, M Morgan.   

Abstract

A shape can be more difficult to identify when other shapes are near it. For example, when several grating patches are viewed parafoveally, observers are unable to report the orientation of the central patch. This phenomenon, known as 'crowding,' has historically been confused with lateral masking, in which one stimulus attenuates signals generated by another stimulus. Here we show that despite their inability to report the orientation of an individual patch, observers can reliably estimate the average orientation, demonstrating that the local orientation signals are combined rather than lost. Our results imply that crowding is distinct from ordinary masking, and is perhaps related to texture perception. Under crowded conditions, the orientation signals in primary visual cortex are pooled before they reach consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11426231     DOI: 10.1038/89532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  278 in total

1.  Substitution and pooling in crowding.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The mechanism of word crowding.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Melanie M U Akau; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual crowding is correlated with awareness.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Perceived pattern regularity computed as a summary statistic: implications for camouflage.

Authors:  M J Morgan; I Mareschal; C Chubb; J A Solomon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Flexible mechanisms underlie the evaluation of visual confidence.

Authors:  Simon Barthelmé; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The perceptual processing capacity of summary statistics between and within feature dimensions.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Foveal input is not required for perception of crowd facial expression.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; Anna A Kosovicheva; Allison Yamanashi Leib; Katherine Wood; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Distinct cognitive mechanisms involved in the processing of single objects and object ensembles.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Sol Z Sun; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Error-driven learning in statistical summary perception.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Functional analysis of the periphery effect in human building related areas.

Authors:  Ifat Levy; Uri Hasson; Michal Harel; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.