Literature DB >> 18408924

High-resolution morphological and biochemical imaging of articular cartilage of the ankle joint at 3.0 T using a new dedicated phased array coil: in vivo reproducibility study.

Goetz H Welsch1, Tallal C Mamisch, Michael Weber, Wilhelm Horger, Klaus Bohndorf, Siegfried Trattnig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantitative T2 mapping of the talocrural cartilage within a clinically applicable scan time using a new dedicated ankle coil and high-field MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers (mean age 32.4 years) underwent MRI of the ankle. As morphological sequences, proton density fat-suppressed turbo spin echo (PD-FS-TSE), as a reference, was compared with 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP). Furthermore, biochemical quantitative T2 imaging was prepared using a multi-echo spin-echo T2 approach. Data analysis was performed three times each by three different observers on sagittal slices, planned on the isotropic 3D-TrueFISP; as a morphological parameter, cartilage thickness was assessed and for T2 relaxation times, region-of-interest (ROI) evaluation was done. Reproducibility was determined as a coefficient of variation (CV) for each volunteer; averaged as root mean square (RMSA) given as a percentage; statistical evaluation was done using analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Cartilage thickness of the talocrural joint showed significantly higher values for the 3D-TrueFISP (ranging from 1.07 to 1.14 mm) compared with the PD-FS-TSE (ranging from 0.74 to 0.99 mm); however, both morphological sequences showed comparable good results with RMSA of 7.1 to 8.5%. Regarding quantitative T2 mapping, measurements showed T2 relaxation times of about 54 ms with an excellent reproducibility (RMSA) ranging from 3.2 to 4.7%.
CONCLUSION: In our study the assessment of cartilage thickness and T2 relaxation times could be performed with high reproducibility in a clinically realizable scan time, demonstrating new possibilities for further investigations into patient groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18408924     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0474-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  47 in total

1.  Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: precision and inter-subject variability.

Authors:  Dina Al-Ali; Heiko Graichen; Sonja Faber; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Maximilian Reiser; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint.

Authors:  N Schibany; A Ba-Ssalamah; S Marlovits; V Mlynarik; I M Nöbauer-Huhmann; G Striessnig; M Shodjai-Baghini; G Heinze; S Trattnig
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Cameron Barr; Jan S Bauer; David Malfair; Benjamin Ma; Tobias D Henning; Lynne Steinbach; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value.

Authors:  R Burgkart; C Glaser; A Hyhlik-Dürr; K H Englmeier; M Reiser; F Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-09

Review 6.  [Etiology and pathogenesis of osteochondrosis dissecans tali].

Authors:  J Steinhagen; O Niggemeyer; J Bruns
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage.

Authors:  B J Dardzinski; T J Mosher; S Li; M A Van Slyke; M B Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Robert Stahl; Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Bernard J Dardzinski
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage as determined by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Ashley Williams; Amy Gillis; Charles McKenzie; Bruce Po; Leena Sharma; Lyle Micheli; Brian McKeon; Deborah Burstein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 2.  Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Application of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in evaluation of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Jason L Dragoo; Brian A Hargreaves; Marc E Levenston; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Radiofrequency coils for musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kambiz A Asher; Neal K Bangerter; Ronald D Watkins; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10

5.  High-resolution MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions with new classification.

Authors:  James Francis Griffith; Domily Ting Yi Lau; David Ka Wai Yeung; Margaret Wan Nar Wong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  MRI of the ankle joint in healthy non-athletes and in marathon runners: image quality issues at 7.0 T compared to 1.5 T.

Authors:  J M Theysohn; O Kraff; S Maderwald; P C Kokulinsky; M E Ladd; J Barkhausen; S C Ladd
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance update.

Authors:  E Schneider; M Nessaiver
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of cartilage repair after microfracture (MF) treatment for adult unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) in the ankle: correlations with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Hongyue Tao; Xiliang Shang; Rong Lu; Hong Li; Yinghui Hua; Xiaoyuan Feng; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Initial results of in vivo high-resolution morphological and biochemical cartilage imaging of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the ankle.

Authors:  Sebastian Quirbach; Siegfried Trattnig; Stefan Marlovits; Valentin Zimmermann; Stephan Domayer; Ronald Dorotka; Tallal C Mamisch; Klaus Bohndorf; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Radiofrequency (RF) coil impacts the value and reproducibility of cartilage spin-spin (T2) relaxation time measurements.

Authors:  B J Dardzinski; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.