Literature DB >> 17061070

MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens.

Cameron Barr1, Jan S Bauer, David Malfair, Benjamin Ma, Tobias D Henning, Lynne Steinbach, Thomas M Link.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to optimize ankle joint MR imaging in volunteers at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0 T, and to compare these optimized sequences concerning image quality and performance in assessing cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in fresh human cadaver specimens. Initially our clinical ankle protocol consisting of T1-weighted (-w), fat-saturated (fs) T2-w, and short tau inversion-recovery fast spinecho (FSE) sequences was optimized at 1.5 T and 3.0 T by two radiologists. For dedicated cartilage imaging, fs-intermediate (IM)-w FSE, fs spoiled gradient echo, and balanced free-precession steady-state sequences were optimized. Using the optimized sequences, thirteen cadaver ankle joints were imaged. Four radiologists independently assessed these images concerning image quality and pathology. All radiologists consistently rated image quality higher at 3.0 T (all sequences p<0.05). For detecting cartilage pathology, diagnostic performance was significantly higher at 3.0 T (ROC-values up to 0.93 vs. 0.77; p<0.05); the fs-IM FSE sequence showed highest values among the different sequences. Average sensitivity for detecting tendon pathology was 63% at 3.0 T vs. 41% at 1.5 T and was significantly higher at 3.0 T for 2 out of 4 radiologists (p<0.05). Compared to 1.5 T, imaging of the ankle joint at 3.0 T significantly improved image quality and diagnostic performance in assessing cartilage pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17061070     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0446-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging and surgical correlation of peroneus brevis tears.

Authors:  Bradley M Lamm; Daniel T Myers; Michael Dombek; Robert W Mendicino; Alan R Catanzariti; Karl Saltrick
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.286

2.  Rapid musculoskeletal MRI with phase-sensitive steady-state free precession: comparison with routine knee MRI.

Authors:  Shreyas S Vasanawala; Brian A Hargreaves; John M Pauly; Dwight G Nishimura; Christopher F Beaulieu; Garry E Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Brian Suh; Anne Sawyer-Glover; Christopher Beaulieu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint.

Authors:  N Schibany; A Ba-Ssalamah; S Marlovits; V Mlynarik; I M Nöbauer-Huhmann; G Striessnig; M Shodjai-Baghini; G Heinze; S Trattnig
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Multicontrast-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla: ex-vivo comparison with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Andreas Koops; Harald Ittrich; Susan Petri; Andrew Priest; Alexander Stork; Ute Lockemann; Gerhard Adam; Christoph Weber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Cadaver correlation of peroneal tendon changes with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Sobel; W H Bohne; J A Markisz
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1991-06

Review 8.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy.

Authors:  F R Noyes; C L Stabler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.

Authors:  P R Kornaat; S B Reeder; S Koo; J H Brittain; H Yu; T P Andriacchi; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging.

Authors:  Brian A Hargreaves; Garry E Gold; Christopher F Beaulieu; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Dwight G Nishimura; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  25 in total

1.  Pseudotear of the peroneus longus tendon on MRI, secondary to a fibrocartilaginous node.

Authors:  Manjiri M Didolkar; Alfred L Malone; James A Nunley; Leslie G Dodd; Clyde A Helms
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Routine clinical knee MR reports: comparison of diagnostic performance at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for assessment of the articular cartilage.

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Jeffrey A Rhodes; Nehal Shah; Glenn C Gaviola; Andreas H Gomoll; Stacy E Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  High-resolution MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions with new classification.

Authors:  James Francis Griffith; Domily Ting Yi Lau; David Ka Wai Yeung; Margaret Wan Nar Wong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Subjects with higher physical activity levels have more severe focal knee lesions diagnosed with 3T MRI: analysis of a non-symptomatic cohort of the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  C Stehling; N E Lane; M C Nevitt; J Lynch; C E McCulloch; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Evaluation of the chondromalacia patella using a microscopy coil: comparison of the two-dimensional fast spin echo techniques and the three-dimensional fast field echo techniques.

Authors:  Hyun-joo Kim; Sang Hoon Lee; Chang Ho Kang; Jeong Ah Ryu; Myung Jin Shin; Kyung-Ja Cho; Woo Shin Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Loading of the knee during 3.0T MRI is associated with significantly increased medial meniscus extrusion in mild and moderate osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Christoph Stehling; Richard B Souza; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Bradley T Wyman; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  MRI of the ankle joint in healthy non-athletes and in marathon runners: image quality issues at 7.0 T compared to 1.5 T.

Authors:  J M Theysohn; O Kraff; S Maderwald; P C Kokulinsky; M E Ladd; J Barkhausen; S C Ladd
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Assessment of cartilage-dedicated sequences at ultra-high-field MRI: comparison of imaging performance and diagnostic confidence between 3.0 and 7.0 T with respect to osteoarthritis-induced changes at the knee joint.

Authors:  Robert Stahl; Roland Krug; Douglas A C Kelley; Jin Zuo; C Benjamin Ma; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  [Advanced cartilage imaging for detection of cartilage injuries and osteochondral lesions].

Authors:  A S Gersing; B J Schwaiger; K Wörtler; P M Jungmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee.

Authors:  Scott Wong; Lynne Steinbach; Jian Zhao; Christoph Stehling; C Benjamin Ma; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.