OBJECTIVE: To present imaging characteristics of the ankle at 7.0 T and to investigate the appearance and image quality of presumed pathologies of ankles without physical strain as well as of ankles after a marathon run in comparison to 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Appearance of presumed pathologic findings and image quality of TSE (PD, T2, and STIR) and GRE sequences (MEDIC, DESS, and/or CISS) at 7.0 T and 1.5 T MRI were compared by two senior radiologists in consensus in two healthy controls without strain and in six marathon runners after a full-length marathon (eight males, mean age 49.1 years). RESULTS: Overall, 7.0 T MRI allowed for higher resolution images for most of the sequences while requiring comparable acquisition times and achieving high contrast images mainly in gradient echo sequences. Bursal or presumed peritendineal fluid and/or edematous tissue, which were found in seven of eight subjects, could be best appreciated with 7.0 T MEDIC. Other findings with sharper delineation at 7.0 T included cartilage defects (best: CISS), osseous avulsions, and osteophytes (best: DESS). Nevertheless, 1.5 T STIR imaging enabled assessment of a tibiotalar bone edema-like lesion in two runners, which was barely visible at 7.0 T using STIR, but not with any other sequence at 7.0 T including MEDIC (with frequency selective fat suppression). 7.0 T showed larger image quality variations with challenges especially in the TSE sequences. CONCLUSION: Our initial results of ultra-high-field ankle joint imaging demonstrate the improved depiction of ankle anatomy, fluid depositions, and cartilage defects. However imaging of edema-like bone lesions remains challenging at ultra-high magnetic field strength, and TSE coverage in particular is limited by the specific absorption rate.
OBJECTIVE: To present imaging characteristics of the ankle at 7.0 T and to investigate the appearance and image quality of presumed pathologies of ankles without physical strain as well as of ankles after a marathon run in comparison to 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Appearance of presumed pathologic findings and image quality of TSE (PD, T2, and STIR) and GRE sequences (MEDIC, DESS, and/or CISS) at 7.0 T and 1.5 T MRI were compared by two senior radiologists in consensus in two healthy controls without strain and in six marathon runners after a full-length marathon (eight males, mean age 49.1 years). RESULTS: Overall, 7.0 T MRI allowed for higher resolution images for most of the sequences while requiring comparable acquisition times and achieving high contrast images mainly in gradient echo sequences. Bursal or presumed peritendineal fluid and/or edematous tissue, which were found in seven of eight subjects, could be best appreciated with 7.0 T MEDIC. Other findings with sharper delineation at 7.0 T included cartilage defects (best: CISS), osseous avulsions, and osteophytes (best: DESS). Nevertheless, 1.5 T STIR imaging enabled assessment of a tibiotalar bone edema-like lesion in two runners, which was barely visible at 7.0 T using STIR, but not with any other sequence at 7.0 T including MEDIC (with frequency selective fat suppression). 7.0 T showed larger image quality variations with challenges especially in the TSE sequences. CONCLUSION: Our initial results of ultra-high-field ankle joint imaging demonstrate the improved depiction of ankle anatomy, fluid depositions, and cartilage defects. However imaging of edema-like bone lesions remains challenging at ultra-high magnetic field strength, and TSE coverage in particular is limited by the specific absorption rate.
Authors: Garry E Gold; Eric Han; Jeff Stainsby; Graham Wright; Jean Brittain; Christopher Beaulieu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: T M Link; C A Sell; J N Masi; C Phan; D Newitt; Y Lu; L Steinbach; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Cameron Barr; Jan S Bauer; David Malfair; Benjamin Ma; Tobias D Henning; Lynne Steinbach; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-10-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: F Fischbach; H Bruhn; F Unterhauser; J Ricke; G Wieners; R Felix; A Weiler; R J Schröder Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Robert Stahl; Anthony Luke; C Benjamin Ma; Roland Krug; Lynne Steinbach; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2008-05-08 Impact factor: 2.199