Literature DB >> 22688975

MRI of the ankle joint in healthy non-athletes and in marathon runners: image quality issues at 7.0 T compared to 1.5 T.

J M Theysohn1, O Kraff, S Maderwald, P C Kokulinsky, M E Ladd, J Barkhausen, S C Ladd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present imaging characteristics of the ankle at 7.0 T and to investigate the appearance and image quality of presumed pathologies of ankles without physical strain as well as of ankles after a marathon run in comparison to 1.5 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Appearance of presumed pathologic findings and image quality of TSE (PD, T2, and STIR) and GRE sequences (MEDIC, DESS, and/or CISS) at 7.0 T and 1.5 T MRI were compared by two senior radiologists in consensus in two healthy controls without strain and in six marathon runners after a full-length marathon (eight males, mean age 49.1 years).
RESULTS: Overall, 7.0 T MRI allowed for higher resolution images for most of the sequences while requiring comparable acquisition times and achieving high contrast images mainly in gradient echo sequences. Bursal or presumed peritendineal fluid and/or edematous tissue, which were found in seven of eight subjects, could be best appreciated with 7.0 T MEDIC. Other findings with sharper delineation at 7.0 T included cartilage defects (best: CISS), osseous avulsions, and osteophytes (best: DESS). Nevertheless, 1.5 T STIR imaging enabled assessment of a tibiotalar bone edema-like lesion in two runners, which was barely visible at 7.0 T using STIR, but not with any other sequence at 7.0 T including MEDIC (with frequency selective fat suppression). 7.0 T showed larger image quality variations with challenges especially in the TSE sequences.
CONCLUSION: Our initial results of ultra-high-field ankle joint imaging demonstrate the improved depiction of ankle anatomy, fluid depositions, and cartilage defects. However imaging of edema-like bone lesions remains challenging at ultra-high magnetic field strength, and TSE coverage in particular is limited by the specific absorption rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22688975     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1454-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  21 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Eric Han; Jeff Stainsby; Graham Wright; Jean Brittain; Christopher Beaulieu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0T.

Authors:  Ravinder R Regatte; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  MR imaging of the normal and abnormal retrocalcaneal bursae.

Authors:  B A Bottger; M E Schweitzer; K I El-Noueam; M Desai
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Can running cause the appearance of marrow edema on MR images of the foot and ankle?

Authors:  K M Lazzarini; R N Troiano; R C Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology--ROC analysis in an experimental model.

Authors:  T M Link; C A Sell; J N Masi; C Phan; D Newitt; Y Lu; L Steinbach; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Cameron Barr; Jan S Bauer; David Malfair; Benjamin Ma; Tobias D Henning; Lynne Steinbach; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MRI of the ankle: effect on diagnostic confidence and patient management.

Authors:  Philip W P Bearcroft; Suzanne Guy; Michelle Bradley; Fred Robinson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  F Fischbach; H Bruhn; F Unterhauser; J Ricke; G Wieners; R Felix; A Weiler; R J Schröder
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  MRI of the knee at 7.0 Tesla.

Authors:  O Kraff; J M Theysohn; S Maderwald; C Saylor; S C Ladd; M E Ladd; J Barkhausen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2007-11-14

10.  Prevalence of pathologic findings in asymptomatic knees of marathon runners before and after a competition in comparison with physically active subjects-a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Robert Stahl; Anthony Luke; C Benjamin Ma; Roland Krug; Lynne Steinbach; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Physiology and Pathophysiology in Ultra-Marathon Running.

Authors:  Beat Knechtle; Pantelis T Nikolaidis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 2.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 7 T: do we need more or is it more than enough?

Authors:  Giacomo Aringhieri; Virna Zampa; Michela Tosetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-08-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.