Literature DB >> 11906437

Mammary gland architecture as a determining factor in the susceptibility of the human breast to cancer.

J Russo1, H Lynch, I H Russo.   

Abstract

The developmental pattern of the breast can be assessed by determining the composition of the breast in specific lobular structures, which are designated as lobules type 1 (Lob 1), lobules type 2 (Lob 2), and lobules type 3 (Lob 3), with Lob 1 being the less developed and Lob 3 being the most differentiated or with the highest number of ductules per lobular unit. In the present work, the patient population consisted of three groups of women who underwent surgical procedures: The first group included women who underwent reduction mammoplasty (RM) for cosmetic reasons. The second group included women who underwent prophylactic subcutaneous mastectomy after genetic counseling for either carrying the BRCA-1 gene or belonging to a pedigree with familial breast cancer (FAM), and the third group included women who underwent modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for the diagnosis of invasive carcinoma. The RM group consisted of 33 women, of whom 9 were nulliparous and 24 were parous. The FAM group consisted of 17 women, of whom 8 were nulliparous and 9 were parous. The MRM group consisted of 43 women, of whom 7 were nulliparous and 36 were parous. The analysis of the lobular composition of all of the samples from the RM group, which is considered the control group, revealed that Lob 1 represented 22%, Lob 2 represented 37%, and Lob 3 represented 38%, whereas the tissue examined from the FAM and MRM groups contained a preponderance of Lob 1 at 48% and 74%, respectively, over Lob 3, which was 10% and 3%, respectively. When the results of the analysis of breast tissue were separated according to the pregnancy history of the donor, it was found that in the control group or RM, there was a significant difference in lobular composition. Nulliparous women of the RM group showed a preponderance of Lob 1 (46%) over parous women, which contained only 17%, whereas the percentage of Lob 3 in the nulliparous group was significantly lower (7%) than the parous group (48%). In the breast tissues obtained from FAM and MRM, no significant differences in lobular composition were observed, as all of the samples contained a higher concentration of Lob 1, independent of the pregnancy history. The breast tissue of FAM and MRM of parous women had a developmental pattern that was similar to that of nulliparous women of the same group and that was less developed than the breast of parous women of the control group. An important difference between the Lob 1 of the FAM group versus the control (RM) and the MRM group was that most of these lobules had thin ductules with an increase in hyalinization of the intralobular stroma manifested in the whole-mount preparation as an alteration in the branching pattern. The data suggest that the breast tissue of women with invasive cancer, as well as those from a background of familial breast cancer, have an architectural pattern different from the control or normal tissues and that the BRCA-1 or related genes may have a functional role in the branching pattern of the breast during lobular development, mainly in the epithelial stroma interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11906437     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.21033.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  38 in total

Review 1.  The normal microenvironment directs mammary gland development.

Authors:  Erin J McCave; Cheryl A P Cass; Karen J L Burg; Brian W Booth
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Pregnancies, breast-feeding, and breast cancer risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study (IBCCS).

Authors:  Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Douglas F Easton; Matti Rookus; Richard Brohet; Antonis C Antoniou; Susan Peock; Gareth Evans; Diana Eccles; Fiona Douglas; Catherine Noguès; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Agnès Chompret; Flora E Van Leeuwen; Irma Kluijt; Javier Benitez; Brita Arver; Edith Olah; Jenny Chang-Claude
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Classification of breast computed tomography data.

Authors:  Thomas R Nelson; Laura I Cerviño; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Developmental disease and cancer: biological and clinical overlaps.

Authors:  Alfonso Bellacosa
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Histology and Transcriptome Profiles of the Mammary Gland across Critical Windows of Development in Sprague Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Kalpana Gopalakrishnan; Susan L Teitelbaum; James Wetmur; Fabiana Manservisi; Laura Falcioni; Simona Panzacchi; Federica Gnudi; Fiorella Belpoggi; Jia Chen
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Total-genome analysis of BRCA1/2-related invasive carcinomas of the breast identifies tumor stroma as potential landscaper for neoplastic initiation.

Authors:  Frank Weber; Lei Shen; Koichi Fukino; Attila Patocs; George L Mutter; Trinidad Caldes; Charis Eng
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Industry is not the dark side, but an essential partner to make progress in reproductive health.

Authors:  Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-03

9.  Lobule type and subsequent breast cancer risk: results from the Nurses' Health Studies.

Authors:  Heather J Baer; Laura C Collins; James L Connolly; Graham A Colditz; Stuart J Schnitt; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  The contribution of dynamic stromal remodeling during mammary development to breast carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jessica McCready; Lisa M Arendt; Jenny A Rudnick; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.