Literature DB >> 18397040

Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Kostas Kokkinakis1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implants seek to restore the advantages of binaural hearing by improving access to binaural cues. Bilateral implant users are currently fitted with two processors, one in each ear, operating independent of one another. In this work, a different approach to bilateral processing is explored based on blind source separation (BSS) by utilizing two implants driven by a single processor. Sentences corrupted by interfering speech or speech-shaped noise are presented to bilateral cochlear implant users at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed BSS method. Subjects are tested in both anechoic and reverberant settings, wherein the target and masker signals are spatially separated. Results indicate substantial improvements in performance in both anechoic and reverberant settings over the subjects' daily strategies for both masker conditions and at various locations of the masker. It is speculated that such improvements are due to the fact that the proposed BSS algorithm capitalizes on the variations of interaural level differences and interaural time delays present in the mixtures of the signals received by the two microphones, and exploits that information to spatially separate the target from the masker signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18397040      PMCID: PMC2677310          DOI: 10.1121/1.2839887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics.

Authors:  S R Bistafa; J S Bradley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Bruce J Gantz; Jay T Rubinstein; Blake S Wilson; Aaron J Parkinson; Abigail Wolaver; John P Preece; Shelley Witt; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  On application of adaptive decorrelation filtering to assistive listening.

Authors:  Yunxin Zhao; Kuan-Chieh Yen; Sig Soli; Shawn Gao; Andy Vermiglio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Joachim Müller; F Schön; J Helms
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Arthur Lobo; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Sarah F Poissant; Nathaniel A Whitmal; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Multi-microphone adaptive noise reduction strategies for coordinated stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the importance of preserving the harmonics and neighboring partials prior to vocoder processing: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Selective-tap blind signal processing for speech separation.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

Review 6.  Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Behnam Azimi; Yi Hu; David R Friedland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-23

7.  A method to enhance the use of interaural time differences for cochlear implants in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.