Literature DB >> 10687696

Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics.

S R Bistafa1, J S Bradley.   

Abstract

Speech intelligibility metrics that take into account sound reflections in the room and the background noise have been compared, assuming diffuse sound field. Under this assumption, sound decays exponentially with a decay constant inversely proportional to reverberation time. Analytical formulas were obtained for each speech intelligibility metric providing a common basis for comparison. These formulas were applied to three sizes of rectangular classrooms. The sound source was the human voice without amplification, and background noise was taken into account by a noise-to-signal ratio. Correlations between the metrics and speech intelligibility are presented and applied to the classrooms under study. Relationships between some speech intelligibility metrics were also established. For each noise-to-signal ratio, the value of each speech intelligibility metric is maximized for a specific reverberation time. For quiet classrooms, the reverberation time that maximizes these speech intelligibility metrics is between 0.1 and 0.3 s. Speech intelligibility of 100% is possible with reverberation times up to 0.4-0.5 s and this is the recommended range. The study suggests "ideal" and "acceptable" maximum background-noise level for classrooms of 25 and 20 dB, respectively, below the voice level at 1 m in front of the talker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10687696     DOI: 10.1121/1.428268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Hallie M Plevinsky; John M Franco; Elizabeth C Heinrichs-Graham; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Directional hearing AIDS.

Authors:  T A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-12

5.  Excessive noise levels are noted in kindergarten classrooms in the island of Crete.

Authors:  Nikolaos S Chatzakis; Alexander D Karatzanis; Meropi E Helidoni; Stelios G Velegrakis; Panagiotis Christodoulou; Georgios A Velegrakis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  The effect of technology and testing environment on speech perception using telehealth with cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Daniel L Valente; Ryan W McCreery; Gina R Diaz; Todd Sanford; Roger Harpster
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Dawna Lewis; Gina Angley; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  A methodology to objectively assess the performance of sound field amplification systems demonstrated using 50 physical simulations of classroom conditions.

Authors:  Stephen Dance; Bradford Backus; Lorenzo Morales
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  Moderate Reverberation Does Not Increase Subjective Fatigue, Subjective Listening Effort, or Behavioral Listening Effort in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Brianna Bean; Steven C Marcrum; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.