Literature DB >> 25096120

Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments.

Raymond L Goldsworthy1, Lorraine A Delhorne2, Joseph G Desloge2, Louis D Braida2.   

Abstract

This article introduces and provides an assessment of a spatial-filtering algorithm based on two closely-spaced (∼1 cm) microphones in a behind-the-ear shell. The evaluated spatial-filtering algorithm used fast (∼10 ms) temporal-spectral analysis to determine the location of incoming sounds and to enhance sounds arriving from straight ahead of the listener. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for eight cochlear implant (CI) users using consonant and vowel materials under three processing conditions: An omni-directional response, a dipole-directional response, and the spatial-filtering algorithm. The background noise condition used three simultaneous time-reversed speech signals as interferers located at 90°, 180°, and 270°. Results indicated that the spatial-filtering algorithm can provide speech reception benefits of 5.8 to 10.7 dB SRT compared to an omni-directional response in a reverberant room with multiple noise sources. Given the observed SRT benefits, coupled with an efficient design, the proposed algorithm is promising as a CI noise-reduction solution.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25096120      PMCID: PMC4144183          DOI: 10.1121/1.4887453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  J J Hanekom; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research.

Authors:  M D Burkhard; R M Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Presentation level determination for CV tokens using a computer-controlled adaptive procedure.

Authors:  L G Wall; S A Davidson; R A Fox
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids.

Authors:  J E Greenberg; P M Zurek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral subtraction-based speech enhancement for cochlear implant patients in background noise.

Authors:  Li-Ping Yang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  Ann Spriet; Lieselot Van Deun; Kyriaky Eftaxiadis; Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Bas van Dijk; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Enhancing Auditory Selective Attention Using a Visually Guided Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effect of signal processing strategy and stimulation type on speech and auditory perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Susan M Reynolds; René H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Two-microphone spatial filtering improves speech reception for cochlear-implant users in reverberant conditions with multiple noise sources.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Improving Speech Recognition in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users by Listening With the Better Ear.

Authors:  Alan Kan
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.