Literature DB >> 18392829

Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose.

Sebastian Leschka1, Paul Stolzmann, Florian T Schmid, Hans Scheffel, Bjoern Stinn, Borut Marincek, Hatem Alkadhi, Simon Wildermuth.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of low kilovoltage dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) on qualitative and quantitative image quality parameters and radiation dose. Dual-source CTCA with retrospective ECG gating was performed in 80 consecutive patients of normal weight. Forty were examined with a standard protocol (120 kV/330mAs), 20 were examined at 100 kV/330mAs, and 20 at 100 kV/220mAs. Two blinded observers independently assessed image quality of each coronary segment and measured the image parameters noise, attenuation, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The effective radiation dose was calculated using CT dose volume index and the dose-length product. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 99% of all coronary segments (1,127/1,140) without significant differences among the protocols. Image noise, attenuation, and CNR were significantly higher for 100 kV/330mAs (26 +/- 3 HU, 549 +/- 62 HU, 25.5 +/- 3.2; each P < 0.01) and 100 kV/220mAs (27 +/- 2 HU, 560 +/- 43 HU, 25.0 +/- 2.2; each P < 0.01) when compared to the 120-kV protocol (21 +/- 2 HU, 317 +/- 28 HU, 20.6 +/- 1.7). There was no significant difference between the two 100-kV protocols. Estimated effective radiation dose of the 120-kV protocol (8.9 +/- 1.2 mSv) was significantly higher than the 100 kV/330mAs (6.7 +/- 0.8 mSv, P < 0.01) or 100 kV/220mAs (4.4 +/- 0.6 mSv, P < 0.001) protocols. Dual-source CTCA with 100 kV is feasible in patients of normal weight, results in a diagnostic image quality with a higher CNR, and at the same time significantly reduces the radiation dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392829     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0966-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; G Levin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed.

Authors:  Bernd J Wintersperger; Konstantin Nikolaou; Franz von Ziegler; Thorsten Johnson; Carsten Rist; Alexander Leber; Thomas Flohr; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach.

Authors:  John M Boone; Estella M Geraghty; J Anthony Seibert; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Tom H Mulkens; Patrick Bellinck; Michel Baeyaert; Dirk Ghysen; Xavier Van Dijck; Elvier Mussen; Caroline Venstermans; Jean-Luc Termote
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing.

Authors:  Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Andre Plass; Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Lars Husmann; Thomas G Flohr; Michele Genoni; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability.

Authors:  David Matt; Hans Scheffel; Sebastian Leschka; Thomas G Flohr; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning.

Authors:  R A Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakayama; Kazuo Awai; Yoshinori Funama; Masahiro Hatemura; Masanori Imuta; Takeshi Nakaura; Da Ryu; Shoji Morishita; Shamima Sultana; Natsuko Sato; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  85 in total

1.  Optimization of energy level for coronary angiography with dual-energy and dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Satoshi Okayama; Ayako Seno; Tsunenari Soeda; Yasuhiro Takami; Rika Kawakami; Satoshi Somekawa; Ken-Ichi Ishigami; Yukiji Takeda; Hiroyuki Kawata; Manabu Horii; Shiro Uemura; Yoshihiko Saito
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Iterative reconstruction of dual-source coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Eun-Ah Park; Whal Lee; Kwang Woo Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Allmendinger Thomas; Jin Wook Chung; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Low-dose cardiovascular computed tomography: where are the limits?

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Carla M Thompson; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  The effect of adaptive iterative dose reduction on image quality in 320-detector row CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  F Tatsugami; M Matsuki; G Nakai; Y Inada; S Kanazawa; Y Takeda; H Morita; H Takada; S Yoshikawa; K Fukumura; Y Narumi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Coronary computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-26

Review 7.  [Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose].

Authors:  S T Schindera; C Nauer; R Treier; P Trueb; G von Allmen; P Vock; Z Szucs-Farkas
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Ron Blankstein; Michael A Bolen; Rodrigo Pale; Meagan K Murphy; Amar B Shah; Hiram G Bezerra; Ammar Sarwar; Ian S Rogers; Udo Hoffmann; Suhny Abbara; Ricardo C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Radiation dose reduction in CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Brian P Shapiro; Phillip M Young; Birgit Kantor; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Cynthia H McCollough; Thomas C Gerber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner; Robert Goetti; Andrè Plass; Stephan Baumueller; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Monika Wieser; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.