Literature DB >> 18363068

Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct.

Cecilia Strömberg1, Magnus Nilsson, Carl-Eric Leijonmarck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a gold standard globally. At the time of surgery, 5 to 10% of patients have coexisting stones in the common bile duct (CBD). There are several alternatives in treating these patients. We have chosen to try to extract the CBD stones at the primary operation by laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration.
METHODS: During the years 1994-2002 laparoscopic attempt of exploration of the CBD was made in 207 patients. Data was prospectively collected in a database, and was analyzed using unconditional logistic regression for risk factor analysis.
RESULTS: In 155 of the 207 patients an attempt of transcystic CBD exploration was made and it was successful in 132 cases (85%). The median operating time was 184 minutes (range 89-384 minutes) and the median postoperative hospital stay was one day (range 1-31 days). The odds ratio for failure in stone clearance among patients with a bile duct diameter greater than 6 mm was 6.90 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-54.61) compared to patients with a bile duct diameter of 6 mm or less. There was a significant threefold increase in risk among patients with stones of greater than 5 mm diameter compared to patients with stones 5 mm or less.
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the CBD had a high frequency of stone clearance and low morbidity in the present study. Moreover, large stones are a risk factor for failure in stone clearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18363068     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9448-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

1.  Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sarli; Domenico R Iusco; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

Authors:  L Enochsson; B Lindberg; F Swahn; U Arnelo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  D-F Hong; Y Xin; D-W Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ.

Authors:  E S J Clayton; S Connor; N Alexakis; E Leandros
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Selective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy without cholangiography. A review of 1139 consecutive cases.

Authors:  R Coppola; M E Riccioni; S Ciletti; L Cosentino; V Ripetti; P Magistrelli; A Picciocchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Management of common bile duct stones: selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: short- and long-term results.

Authors:  W H Schreurs; J R Juttmann; W N H M Stuifbergen; H J M Oostvogel; T J M V van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  A Waage; C Strömberg; C-E Leijonmarck; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy.

Authors:  Hiromi Tokumura; Akiko Umezawa; Hui Cao; Nobuhide Sakamoto; Yoichi Imaoka; Akio Ouchi; Kyoji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

10.  Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones.

Authors:  Kaja Ludwig; Dietmar Lorenz; Ferdinand Koeckerling
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.872

View more
  27 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Primary common bile duct closure is safe following emergency and elective exploration.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Matthew G Tutton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Faisal Hanif; Zubir Ahmed; M Abdel Samie; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The cystohepatic septum: anatomical findings and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Lucas Nahuel Pina; Agustín Rodríguez; Guido Antonio Valdés; María Luz Tartaglia; Alberto Raúl Ferreres
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Transcystic versus traditional laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: its advantages and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liwei Pang; Yan Zhang; Yuwen Wang; Jing Kong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Emergency Is as Effective and Safe as in Elective Setting.

Authors:  Matias E Czerwonko; Juan Pekolj; Pedro Uad; Oscar Mazza; Rodrigo Sanchez-Claria; Guillermo Arbues; Eduardo de Santibañes; Martín de Santibañes; Martín Palavecino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Massimo Chiarugi; Christian Galatioto; Luigi Decanini; Adolfo Puglisi; Piero Lippolis; Chiara Bagnato; Sonia Panicucci; Marco Pelosini; Pietro Iacconi; Massimo Seccia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Common bile duct exploration in an elderly Asian population.

Authors:  Vishal G Shelat; Vincent J M Chia; JeeKeem Low
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

10.  Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis.

Authors:  A Bove; G Bongarzoni; G Palone; R M Di Renzo; E M Calisesi; L Corradetti; M Di Nicola; L Corbellini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.