Literature DB >> 19263129

Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis.

A Bove1, G Bongarzoni, G Palone, R M Di Renzo, E M Calisesi, L Corradetti, M Di Nicola, L Corbellini.   

Abstract

AIM: Incidence of common bile duct stones (CBDS) is approximately 10% in patients with symptomatic gallstones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (TC-CBDE) is safe and efficient in achieving bile duct clearance from stones, with a success rate of between 85% and 95%. The aim of this retrospective study is the evaluation of risk factors and recurrence in patients treated with TC-CBDS.
METHODS: From October 2003 until September 2007, 110 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones and gallbladder were included in the study. Average age was 64 years (range 21-82 years). The procedure was completed laparoscopically in 106 patients (96.4%): with TC-CBDE in 90 patients (85%), who are the object of this study; and with TC-CBDE + perioperative guide wire papillotomy ("rendezvous") in 16 cases (15%). In the 90 patients treated with TC-CBDE which we examined, the risk factors were: preoperative liver function tests, diameter of the common bile duct (normal 8 mm or less), number of stones (<or=3 or more), presence of stones with biliary sludge, and pre- or intraoperative diagnosis. Student's test was used for statistical analysis with a P value of < 0.05 defined as statistically significant. RESULT: The conversion rate to open surgery was 3.6%. There were no mortalities. The average operative time was 115.6 min. The morbility rate was 7.7% with 4.8% local complications and 2.9% general complications. Average follow-up on 90 patients (after TC-CBDE) was 28 months (range 4.2-48 months). We found six recurrences (6.7%). The statistic analysis showed that only number of stones >3 with biliary sludge predicted a recurrence (p < 0.05) while the other factors did not show important clinical variables.
CONCLUSION: TC-CBDE is safe and effective in the majority of cases of CBDS. The incidence of recurrence is low but there are some risk factors, such as number of stones >3 with biliary sludge, which do not favor the successful outcome of the procedure. In such cases, it is essential that the TC-CBDE is integrated with other procedures which, although more complex, assure the clearance of the bile duct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263129     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0377-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  R Riciardi; S Islam; J J Canete; P L Arcand; M E Stoker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  D-F Hong; Y Xin; D-W Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Thirteen years' experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and long-term results.

Authors:  A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; J Sarnari; A De Sanctis; G D'Ambrosio; G Lezoche; S Perretta; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Efficacy of multi-slice computed tomography cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yasumitsu Hirano; Yasuhiko Tatsuzawa; Junzo Shimizu; Seiichi Kinoshita; Yukimitsu Kawaura; Shiro Takahashi
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Renam Tinoco; Augusto Tinoco; Luciana El-Kadre; Leandro Peres; Daniela Sueth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  Cecilia Strömberg; Magnus Nilsson; Carl-Eric Leijonmarck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; E Lezoche; M Morino; E Croce; A Lacy; J Toouli; A Faggioni; V M Ribeiro; J Jakimowicz; J Visa; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  16 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with complicated cholecystitis: a safety and feasibility study.

Authors:  Hung-Chieh Lo; Yu-Chun Wang; Jui-Chien Huang; Cheng-Hsiung Hsu; Shih-Chi Wu; Chi-Hsun Hsieh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct with a rigid scope in patients with problematic choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ahmet Tekin; Zekai Ogetman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Shinpei Doi; Ichiro Yasuda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Takuji Iwashita; Shinya Uemura; Takahiro Yamauchi; Masanori Nakashima; Seiji Adachi; Masahito Shimizu; Eiichi Tomita; Takao Itoi; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland.

Authors:  Anne Mattila; Jussi Luhtala; Johanna Mrena; Hannu Kautiainen; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Transcystic versus traditional laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: its advantages and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liwei Pang; Yan Zhang; Yuwen Wang; Jing Kong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Massimo Chiarugi; Christian Galatioto; Luigi Decanini; Adolfo Puglisi; Piero Lippolis; Chiara Bagnato; Sonia Panicucci; Marco Pelosini; Pietro Iacconi; Massimo Seccia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Common bile duct exploration in an elderly Asian population.

Authors:  Vishal G Shelat; Vincent J M Chia; JeeKeem Low
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

10.  Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: surgical indications and procedure strategies.

Authors:  L Fang; J Wang; W C Dai; B Liang; H M Chen; X W Fu; B B Zheng; J Lei; C W Huang; S B Zou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.