Literature DB >> 14752630

Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

L Enochsson1, B Lindberg, F Swahn, U Arnelo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is still some controversy regarding the optimal timing and best method for the removal of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (IO-ERCP) is an alternative method that should be considered for this procedure. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical outcome of a single-step procedure (IO-ERCP) to remove CBDS, thereby combining two existing high-volume clinical modalities-i.e., laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and ERCP.
METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2001, 674 patients, 192 male and 482 female, underwent cholecystectomy at our hospital. There were 612 LC (90.8%), 37 converted procedures (5.5%), and 25 open operations (3.7%). In 592 of the patients, (87.8%) intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was performed. In 34 (5.7%) of those who had and IOC, an IO-ERCP was performed. While the surgeon waited for the endoscopist, care was taken to introduce a thin guidewire through the lOC catheter and pass it through the sphincter of Oddi, out into the duodenum. This complementary procedure greatly facilitated the subsequent cannulation of the bile ducts.
RESULTS: The cannulation frequency of the CBD was 100%. Common bile duct stones were successfully extracted in 93.5%. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), followed by the insertion of a plastic endoprosthesis, was performed in two patients with remaining stones. The CBD of these two patients was cleared by postoperative ERCP. None of the patients developed postoperative pancreatitis. The operating time was prolonged as compared with the time for LC (192 vs 110 mins; p < 0.05). The length of hospitalization for IO-ERCP patients did not differ from that for patients undergoing cholecystectomy alone (2.6 vs 2.1. days; NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that elective IO-ERCP is a safe and efficient method for removing CBDS that has a low risk of inducing postoperative pancreatitis and does not prolong postoperative hospitalization. This technique enables perioperative extraction of CBDS without open or laparoscopic surgical exploration of the CBD and can be used safely in a routine clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752630     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9021-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in Western Australia: implications for surgical practice.

Authors:  Nigel T Barwood; Liora J Valinsky; Michael S T Hobbs; David R Fletcher; Matthew W Knuiman; Steve C Ridout
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Single-step treatment of gallbladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  G Iodice; C Giardiello; G Francica; G Sarrantonio; G Angelone; S Cristiano; R Finelli; G Tramontano
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones.

Authors:  K F Binmoeller; T W Schafer
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Selective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy without cholangiography. A review of 1139 consecutive cases.

Authors:  R Coppola; M E Riccioni; S Ciletti; L Cosentino; V Ripetti; P Magistrelli; A Picciocchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Changes in the practice of biliary surgery and ERCP during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to Australia: their possible significance.

Authors:  D R Fletcher
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-02

7.  Management of common bile duct stones: selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: short- and long-term results.

Authors:  W H Schreurs; J R Juttmann; W N H M Stuifbergen; H J M Oostvogel; T J M V van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparo-endoscopic "rendezvous": a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment.

Authors:  E Cavina; M Franceschi; F Sidoti; O Goletti; P Buccianti; M Chiarugi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

9.  Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. A new technique for the management of complex choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M J Curet; D E Pitcher; D T Martin; K A Zucker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; M Bafutto; R Zago; M M Machado
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-06
View more
  40 in total

1.  Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ahmed A ElGeidie; Gamal K ElEbidy; Yussef M Naeem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoendoscopic rendezvous: an effective alternative to a failed preoperative ERCP in patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  George Tzovaras; Ioannis Baloyiannis; Andreas Kapsoritakis; Athanassios Psychos; George Paroutoglou; Spyros Potamianos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  [Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis].

Authors:  U T Hopt; U Adam
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Filippo Baracchi; Claudio Miglietta; Niccolò Furlan; Riccardo Ragona; Aldo Garbarini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Treatment of common bile duct stones discovered during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Edward H Phillips; James Toouli; Henry A Pitt; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  [Common bile duct stones. Diagnostic and therapeutic management].

Authors:  S Förster; E Klar
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Bilal Kharbutli; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  A Sharma; P Dahiya; R Khullar; V Soni; M Baijal; P K Chowbey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Acute biliary pancreatitis and cholecystolithiasis in a child: one time treatment with laparoendoscopic "rendez-vous" procedure.

Authors:  Gaetano La Greca; Michele Di Blasi; Francesco Barbagallo; Manuela Di Stefano; Saverio Latteri; Domenico Russello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.