Literature DB >> 12140608

Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy.

Hiromi Tokumura1, Akiko Umezawa, Hui Cao, Nobuhide Sakamoto, Yoichi Imaoka, Akio Ouchi, Kyoji Yamamoto.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration by the transcystic approach and choledochotomy. We selected the transcystic approach for patients whose CBD stones were less than five in number and smaller than 9 mm in diameter, and whose CBD was less than 15 mm in diameter on cholangiograms. Among 217 patients with CBD stones treated laparoscopically, the transcystic approach was performed successfully in 91 of 104 patients in whom it was attempted (87.5%). The other 126 patients underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy, followed by ductal closure with transcystic drainage in 59, T-tube drainage in 46, primary ductal closure in 19, and choledochoduodenostomy in 1. Choledochotomy was converted to open surgery in only 1 patient. The transcystic approach was associated with shorter hospital stay and less morbidity than choledochotomy. However, choledochotomy also had an acceptably low rate of complications. Bile leaks occurred more frequently in those with primary ductal closure than in those with transcystic drainage or T-tube drainage. Residual stones were found in 2 patients with the transcystic approach and in 10 with choledochotomy. The residual stones were removed through the T-tube tract by choledochoscopy in 7 of these 10 patients. From these results we conclude that laparoscopic management of CBD stones is feasible for almost all patients with CBD stones. It is considered to be safe and effective and has the advantage of being a single-stage procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12140608     DOI: 10.1007/s005340200020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  31 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S Ebner; J Rechner; S Beller; K Erhart; F M Riegler; G Szinicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with complicated cholecystitis: a safety and feasibility study.

Authors:  Hung-Chieh Lo; Yu-Chun Wang; Jui-Chien Huang; Cheng-Hsiung Hsu; Shih-Chi Wu; Chi-Hsun Hsieh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  [Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis].

Authors:  U T Hopt; U Adam
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results.

Authors:  J Ch Berthou; B Dron; Ph Charbonneau; K Moussalier; L Pellissier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy.

Authors:  Zhang Leida; Bie Ping; Wang Shuguang; He Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  [Common bile duct stones. Diagnostic and therapeutic management].

Authors:  S Förster; E Klar
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  Simultaneous laparoendoscopic rendezvous for the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  Gaetano La Greca; Francesco Barbagallo; Maria Sofia; Saverio Latteri; Domenico Russello
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  Cecilia Strömberg; Magnus Nilsson; Carl-Eric Leijonmarck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.