Literature DB >> 21444220

Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Lisa M Brown1, Stanley J Rogers, John P Cello, Karen J Brasel, John M Inadomi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians must choose a treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis without knowing whether common bile duct (CBD) stones are present. The purpose of this study was to determine the most cost-effective treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible CBD stones. STUDY
DESIGN: Our decision model included 5 treatment strategies: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) alone followed by expectant management; preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by LC; LC with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) ± common bile duct exploration (CBDE); LC followed by postoperative ERCP; and LC with IOC ± postoperative ERCP. The rates of successful completion of diagnostic testing and therapeutic intervention, test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity), morbidity, and mortality for all procedures are from current literature. Hospitalization costs and lengths of stay are from the 2006 National Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. The probability of CBD stones was varied from 0% to 100% and the most cost-effective strategy was determined at each probability.
RESULTS: Across the CBD stone probability range of 4% to 100%, LC with IOC ± ERCP was the most cost-effective. If the probability was 0%, LC alone was the most cost-effective. Our model was sensitive to 1 health input: specificity of IOC, and 3 costs: cost of hospitalization for LC with CBDE, cost of hospitalization for LC without CBDE, and cost of LC with IOC.
CONCLUSIONS: The most cost-effective treatment strategy for the majority of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis is LC with routine IOC. If stones are detected, CBDE should be forgone and the patient referred for ERCP.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444220      PMCID: PMC3163150          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  62 in total

1.  Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Nickkholgh; S Soltaniyekta; H Kalbasi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  Christophe Aubé; Benoit Delorme; Thierry Yzet; Pascal Burtin; Jérome Lebigot; Patrick Pessaux; Catherine Gondry-Jouet; Jean Boyer; Christine Caron
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  D J Martin; D R Vernon; J Toouli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

4.  Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Johansson; A Thune; L Nelvin; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Renam Tinoco; Augusto Tinoco; Luciana El-Kadre; Leandro Peres; Daniela Sueth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S-J Tang; G B Haber; P Kortan; S Zanati; M Cirocco; M Ennis; A Elfant; D Scheider; H Ter; J Dorais
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  5F sphincterotomes and 4F sphincterotomes are equivalent for the selective cannulation of the common bile duct.

Authors:  Neena S Abraham; Stacey P Williams; Kara Thompson; Jonathon R Love; Donald G MacIntosh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Preoperative risk factors for common bile duct stones: defining the patient at high risk in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era.

Authors:  Michele Grande; Alfonso Torquati; Gianfranco Tucci; Francesco Rulli; Ottavio Adorisio; Attilio Maria Farinon
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.878

10.  A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; G Paroutoglou; J Kountouras; G Chatzimavroudis; C Zavos; I Pilpilidis; G Tzelas; G Tzovaras
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Nicholas Alexakis; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Variation in the use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Yimei Han; Yong-Fang Kuo; Courtney M Townsend; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Megan Winner; John D Allendorf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Routine surveillance cholangiography after percutaneous cholecystostomy delays drain removal and cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Scott C Brakenridge; Frederick A Moore; Camille G Dessaigne; George A Sarosi; William J Zingarelli; Janeen R Jordan; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Alicia M Mohr
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Management of Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Decision Analysis for Choosing the Optimal Imaging Modality.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg; Brintha K Enestvedt; Gennadiy Bakis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of cholecystectomy during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; David R Lairson; Casey A Boyd; Kristin M Sheffield; Vivian Ho; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Anisodamine accelerates spontaneous passage of single symptomatic bile duct stones ≤ 10 mm.

Authors:  Jun Gao; Xue-Mei Ding; Shan Ke; Yi-Ming Zhou; Xiao-Jun Qian; Rui-Liang Ma; Chun-Min Ning; Zong-Hai Xin; Wen-Bing Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Scoring System for the Management of Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: Cost Analysis of a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jake G Prigoff; Gary W Swain; Celia M Divino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Laparoscopic Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Laparoscopic Surgery for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis and Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Ying Luo; Tao Yang; Qiang Yu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  ASGE guidelines result in cost-saving in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Gaurav Singhvi; Rajiv Ampara; Joel Baum; Vivek Gumaste
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.