Literature DB >> 20044767

Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones.

Faisal Hanif1, Zubir Ahmed, M Abdel Samie, Ahmad H M Nassar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to explore the role of transcystic bile duct exploration (TCE) as a first line of treatment for patients with suspected or incidental common bile duct (CBD) stones.
METHODS: A prospective, case-control study of clinically comparable groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) alone (n = 1,854) and combined LC/TCE for CBD stones (n = 253) under the care of one surgeon was performed. Other than ultrasonography, no routine preoperative imaging was used; however, we performed routine intraoperative cholangiography on all patients.
RESULTS: There was no difference in age (49 +/- 15 vs. 57 +/- 19, p = 0.7), sex (79% vs. 82% females, p = 0.6), and ASA grade (1.9 +/- 1 vs. 1.8 +/- 1, p = 0.7). A larger proportion of the TCE group presented as an emergency (TCE 45% vs. LC alone 27%, p = 0.03) and more often presented with acute biliary pain compared with LC alone (27% vs. 13%, p = 0.02). Although a majority of the patients in the TCE group had clinical or biochemical risk factors for CBD stones (86%), only 27% had suspected stones on preoperative ultrasound. The incidence of jaundice (6% vs. 20%, p = 0.01) was lower in the LC alone group compared with TCE patients. Previous abdominal surgery was noted in 34% patients who underwent LC alone and 30% in LC/TCE (p = 0.06). Significantly there was no difference in open conversion between the two groups (LC alone 0.5% vs. LC/TCE 0.6%, p = 0.07). Comparison of selected outcome parameters for LC versus TCE showed a postoperative hospital stay of 2 (1-14) vs. 2 (1-17) days (p = 0.07), presentation to resolution 1 (1-11) vs. 1 (1-11) weeks (p = 0.07), and morbidity 1.07% vs. 1.2% (p = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: The study advocates single-session laparoscopic cholecystectomy with transcystic CBD exploration as a feasible first choice treatment and the logical next step in the management of patients with CBD stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20044767     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0809-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ.

Authors:  E S J Clayton; S Connor; N Alexakis; E Leandros
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  [Conventional ultrasound in the diagnosis of bile duct calculi].

Authors:  Elena Gologan; Gh Balan; C Stanciu
Journal:  Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec

4.  Identification of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W P Joyce; R Keane; G J Burke; M Daly; J Drumm; T J Egan; P V Delaney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.

Authors:  B K Poulose; P G Arbogast; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  Cecilia Strömberg; Magnus Nilsson; Carl-Eric Leijonmarck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  The spectrum of biliary stone disease.

Authors:  R E Hermann
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  H A Pitt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Endoscopic removal of retained stones after biliary surgery.

Authors:  M E Lambert; D F Martin; D E Tweedle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  20 in total

1.  Basket-in-catheter access for transcystic laparoscopic bile duct exploration: technique and results.

Authors:  Haitham Qandeel; Samer Zino; Zulfiqar Hanif; M Kazem Nassar; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Nuria Estellés Vidagany; Carlos Domingo Del Pozo; Nuria Peris Tomás; Jose Ángel Díez Ares; Antonio Vázquez Tarragón; Francisco Blanes Masson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  M Eikermann; R Siegel; I Broeders; C Dziri; A Fingerhut; C Gutt; T Jaschinski; A Nassar; A M Paganini; D Pieper; E Targarona; M Schrewe; A Shamiyeh; M Strik; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Routine use of simultaneous laparoendoscopic approach in patients with confirmed gallbladder and bile duct stones: fit for laparoscopy fit for "rendezvous".

Authors:  Cinzia Tommasi; Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Riccardo Naspetti; Giulia Cavallina; Roberto Manetti; Luca Talamucci; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Does the surgeon's experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?

Authors:  Astrid Herrero; Claire Philippe; Françoise Guillon; Bertrand Millat; Frédéric Borie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Cinzia Tommasi; Roberto Manetti; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

7.  Transcystic versus traditional laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: its advantages and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liwei Pang; Yan Zhang; Yuwen Wang; Jing Kong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Mostafa A Hamad; Ahmad A Nada; Mohamad Y Abdel-Atty; Ahmad S Kawashti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Massimo Chiarugi; Christian Galatioto; Luigi Decanini; Adolfo Puglisi; Piero Lippolis; Chiara Bagnato; Sonia Panicucci; Marco Pelosini; Pietro Iacconi; Massimo Seccia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Micro-Incision of the Cystic Duct Confluence in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Elderly Patients with Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Niu; Jinghai Song; Xiuwen He; Jian Chen; Jingyong Xu; Zhe Li; Haikong Long; Junmin Wei
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.