Literature DB >> 12616433

Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience.

Leopoldo Sarli1, Domenico R Iusco, Luigi Roncoroni.   

Abstract

No procedure has yet been identified as the "gold standard" for the detection and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This prospective study involves 2137 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The algorithm for diagnostic management in place until July 1997 involved routine intravenous cholangiography and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Subsequently, assessment of the bile duct was not routinely performed, but a scoring system was applied to single out those patients at risk of CBDS who should undergo intravenous cholangiography and/or ERC (see Fig. 2). Whenever bile duct stones were found, endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) was performed, and LC was performed with a standardized four-cannula technique after endoscopic bile duct stone clearance. Common bile duct stones were suspected in 340 patients who were referred for preoperative ERC; 250 patients were referred for ES; 21 patients were referred for open surgery because of failure of ERC or sphincterotomy. Common bile duct stones, detected in 283 cases (13.2%), were removed before surgery in 250 cases (88.3%) and during surgery in 28 cases (9.9%). Self-limited pancreatitis occurred in 4.2% of the patients after sphincterotomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 98.4% of the cases. The conversion rate was 8.3% if sphincterotomy had been performed previously and 3.4% after standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p < 0.001). The morbidity rate was 4.5%; mortality, 0.09%. During follow-up five patients (0.2%) had retained stones endoscopically treated. Future trials of novel strategies for detecting and treating CBDS should compare the results of novel strategies with those of the strategy employed in this study, which includes selective ERC, preoperative ES, and LC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12616433     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6456-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Lincey C F de Nes; Pieter G Versluis; Joris Derksen; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Authors:  A de Vries; S C Donkervoort; A A W van Geloven; E G J M Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  Cecilia Strömberg; Magnus Nilsson; Carl-Eric Leijonmarck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Timing of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with sphincterotomy: a prospective observational study of 308 patients.

Authors:  Erdal Birol Bostanci; Metin Ercan; Ilter Ozer; Zafer Teke; Erkan Parlak; Musa Akoglu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Yuji Nimura; Masahiko Hirota; Fumihiko Miura; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Steven Strasberg; Henry A Pitt; Eduardo de Santibanes; Jacques Belghiti; Markus W Büchler; Dirk J Gouma; Sheung-Tat Fan; Serafin C Hilvano; Joseph W Y Lau; Sun-Whe Kim; Giulio Belli; John A Windsor; Kui-Hin Liau; Vibul Sachakul
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-01-30

6.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Timing of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Anandi H W Schiphorst; Marc G H Besselink; Djamila Boerma; Robin Timmer; Marinus J Wiezer; Karel J van Erpecum; Ivo A M J Broeders; Bert van Ramshorst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  'Single-Sitting' Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Endoscopic Removal of Common Bile Duct Stone for Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis: a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Md Ibrarullah; Tapas Mishra; Ambika P Dash; Devanand Mohapatra; M S Modi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; O van Ruler; L M Dijksman; A A van Geloven; E G Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more difficult after a previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Authors:  Jan Siert Kayitsinga Reinders; Dirk Joan Gouma; Joos Heisterkamp; Ellen Tromp; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.