Literature DB >> 11169836

Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

D L Price1, J P De Wilde, A M Papadaki, J S Curran, R I Kitney.   

Abstract

Acoustic noise levels for fast MRI pulse sequences were surveyed on 14 systems with field strengths ranging from 0.2 T to 3 T. A microphone insensitive to the magnetic environment was placed close to the magnet isocenter and connected via an extension cable to a sound level meter outside the scan room. Measured noise levels varied from 82.5 +/- 0.1 dB(A) for a 0.23 T system to 118.4 +/- 1.3 dB(A) for a 3 T system. Further measurements on four of the closed-bore systems surveyed showed that: 1) pulse sequence parameters (particularly FOV and TR) were more influential in determining noise level than field strength, 2) the noise level was found to vary along the z-direction with a maximum near the bore entrance, and 3) in one of two systems tested there was a significant increase in noise with a volunteer present instead of a test object. The results underline the importance of hearing protection for patients and for staff spending extended periods in the scan room.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11169836     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<288::aid-jmri1041>3.0.co;2-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  49 in total

1.  Quiet MRI with novel acoustic noise reduction.

Authors:  A Katsunuma; H Takamori; Y Sakakura; Y Hamamura; Y Ogo; R Katayama
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T.

Authors:  W Schwindt; H Kugel; R Bachmann; S Kloska; T Allkemper; D Maintz; B Pfleiderer; B Tombach; W Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Piotr A Wielopolski; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Characterization of vibration and acoustic noise in a gradient-coil insert.

Authors:  G Z Yao; C K Mechefske; B K Rutt
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  Occupational exposure in MRI.

Authors:  D W McRobbie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants.

Authors:  Hyun Gi Kim; Jin Wook Choi; Soo Han Yoon; Sieun Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.