Literature DB >> 21713978

Addressing phase errors in fat-water imaging using a mixed magnitude/complex fitting method.

D Hernando1, C D G Hines, H Yu, S B Reeder.   

Abstract

Accurate, noninvasive measurements of liver fat content are needed for the early diagnosis and quantitative staging of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Chemical shift-based fat quantification methods acquire images at multiple echo times using a multiecho spoiled gradient echo sequence, and provide fat fraction measurements through postprocessing. However, phase errors, such as those caused by eddy currents, can adversely affect fat quantification. These phase errors are typically most significant at the first echo of the echo train, and introduce bias in complex-based fat quantification techniques. These errors can be overcome using a magnitude-based technique (where the phase of all echoes is discarded), but at the cost of significantly degraded signal-to-noise ratio, particularly for certain choices of echo time combinations. In this work, we develop a reconstruction method that overcomes these phase errors without the signal-to-noise ratio penalty incurred by magnitude fitting. This method discards the phase of the first echo (which is often corrupted) while maintaining the phase of the remaining echoes (where phase is unaltered). We test the proposed method on 104 patient liver datasets (from 52 patients, each scanned twice), where the fat fraction measurements are compared to coregistered spectroscopy measurements. We demonstrate that mixed fitting is able to provide accurate fat fraction measurements with high signal-to-noise ratio and low bias over a wide choice of echo combinations.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21713978      PMCID: PMC3525711          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  33 in total

1.  Parameter estimation from Rician-distributed data sets using a maximum likelihood estimator: application to T1 and perfusion measurements.

Authors:  O T Karlsen; R Verhagen; W M Bovée
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Chemical shift imaging with spectrum modeling.

Authors:  L An; Q S Xiang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Zhifei Wen; Huanzhou Yu; Angel R Pineda; Garry E Gold; Michael Markl; Norbert J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm.

Authors:  Jingfei Ma
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population.

Authors:  Lidia S Szczepaniak; Pamela Nurenberg; David Leonard; Jeffrey D Browning; Jason S Reingold; Scott Grundy; Helen H Hobbs; Robert L Dobbins
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cedric M J de Bazelaire; Guillaume D Duhamel; Neil M Rofsky; David C Alsop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction.

Authors:  G H Glover; E Schneider
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  In vivo characterization of the liver fat ¹H MR spectrum.

Authors:  Gavin Hamilton; Takeshi Yokoo; Mark Bydder; Irene Cruite; Michael E Schroeder; Claude B Sirlin; Michael S Middleton
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Water-fat imaging with direct phase encoding.

Authors:  Q S Xiang; L An
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Combination of complex-based and magnitude-based multiecho water-fat separation for accurate quantification of fat-fraction.

Authors:  Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Catherine D G Hines; Charles A McKenzie; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  61 in total

1.  Proton density fat-fraction: a standardized MR-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Houchun H Hu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Multi-echo MR thermometry using iterative separation of baseline water and fat images.

Authors:  Megan E Poorman; Ieva Braškutė; Lambertus W Bartels; William A Grissom
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Assessment of a high-SNR chemical-shift-encoded MRI with complex reconstruction for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation overall and in the low-fat range.

Authors:  Charlie C Park; Catherine Hooker; Jonathan C Hooker; Emily Bass; William Haufe; Alexandra Schlein; Yesenia Covarrubias; Elhamy Heba; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Rohit Loomba; Jeffrey Schwimmer; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder; Michael Middleton; Claude B Sirlin; Gavin Hamilton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Bone marrow fat quantification in the presence of trabecular bone: initial comparison between water-fat imaging and single-voxel MRS.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Karampinos; Gerd Melkus; Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer; Ernst J Rummeny; Roland Krug
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  On the confounding effect of temperature on chemical shift-encoded fat quantification.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Samir D Sharma; Harald Kramer; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Association between novel MRI-estimated pancreatic fat and liver histology-determined steatosis and fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  N S Patel; M R Peterson; D A Brenner; E Heba; C Sirlin; R Loomba
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 7.  Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review.

Authors:  Hannah I Awai; Kimberly P Newton; Claude B Sirlin; Cynthia Behling; Jeffrey B Schwimmer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Chemical Shift magnetization transfer magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Weiguo Li; Xifu Wang; Frank H Miller; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Motion-robust, high-SNR liver fat quantification using a 2D sequential acquisition with a variable flip angle approach.

Authors:  Ruiyang Zhao; Yuxin Zhang; Xiaoke Wang; Timothy J Colgan; Jennifer L Rehm; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Diego Hernando
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Quantification of liver proton-density fat fraction in 7.1T preclinical MR systems: Impact of the fitting technique.

Authors:  Christoph Mahlke; Diego Hernando; Christina Jahn; Antonio Cigliano; Till Ittermann; Anne Mössler; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Grazyna Domaska; Scott B Reeder; Jens-Peter Kühn
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.