PURPOSE: To develop automated software for optic nerve head (ONH) quantitative assessment from stereoscopic disc photographs and to evaluate its performance in comparison with human expert assessment. METHODS: A fully automated system, including three-dimensional ONH modeling, disc margin detection, cup margin detection, and calculation of stereometric ONH parameters, was developed and tested. One eye each from 54 subjects (23 healthy, 17 suspected glaucoma, and 14 glaucoma) was enrolled. The majority opinion of three experts defined disc and cup margins on the disc photographs was used for comparison. Seven ONH parameters, disc area, rim area, rim volume, cup area, cup volume, cup-to-disc (C/D) area ratio, and vertical C/D ratio, were computed based on both machine- and expert-defined margins and compared between the methods. RESULTS: All automated ONH measurements showed good correlation with the expert defined margins (Pearson r = 0.90, disc area; 0.56, rim area; 0.78, rim volume; 0.88, cup area; 0.93, cup volume; 0.69, C/D area ratio; and 0.67, vertical C/D ratio; all P <or= 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found in the glaucoma-discriminating ability of all seven ONH parameters (P >or= 0.21). The mean or median of automatically defined disc and cup areas was significantly higher than the subjective assessment (disc area P = 0.0001, t-test; cup area P = 0.036, Wilcoxon signed ranks test), although they had high correlation coefficients. The software failed to detect the disc margin for all the disc photographs with peripapillary atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: The automated ONH analysis method provides an objective and quantitative ONH evaluation using widely available stereo disc photographs.
PURPOSE: To develop automated software for optic nerve head (ONH) quantitative assessment from stereoscopic disc photographs and to evaluate its performance in comparison with human expert assessment. METHODS: A fully automated system, including three-dimensional ONH modeling, disc margin detection, cup margin detection, and calculation of stereometric ONH parameters, was developed and tested. One eye each from 54 subjects (23 healthy, 17 suspected glaucoma, and 14 glaucoma) was enrolled. The majority opinion of three experts defined disc and cup margins on the disc photographs was used for comparison. Seven ONH parameters, disc area, rim area, rim volume, cup area, cup volume, cup-to-disc (C/D) area ratio, and vertical C/D ratio, were computed based on both machine- and expert-defined margins and compared between the methods. RESULTS: All automated ONH measurements showed good correlation with the expert defined margins (Pearson r = 0.90, disc area; 0.56, rim area; 0.78, rim volume; 0.88, cup area; 0.93, cup volume; 0.69, C/D area ratio; and 0.67, vertical C/D ratio; all P <or= 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found in the glaucoma-discriminating ability of all seven ONH parameters (P >or= 0.21). The mean or median of automatically defined disc and cup areas was significantly higher than the subjective assessment (disc area P = 0.0001, t-test; cup area P = 0.036, Wilcoxon signed ranks test), although they had high correlation coefficients. The software failed to detect the disc margin for all the disc photographs with peripapillary atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: The automated ONH analysis method provides an objective and quantitative ONH evaluation using widely available stereo disc photographs.
Authors: James Lowell; Andrew Hunter; David Steel; Ansu Basu; Robert Ryder; Eric Fletcher; Lee Kennedy Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: D F Garway-Heath; D Poinoosawmy; G Wollstein; A Viswanathan; D Kamal; L Fontana; R A Hitchings Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Neil O'Leary; David P Crabb; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Michael D Twa; Michael J Lloyd; Aachal Kotecha; David F Garway-Heath; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-05
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman; Richard A Bilonick; Jongsick Kim; Larry Kagemann; Gadi Wollstein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Juan Xu; Jongsick Kim; Larry Kagemann; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Juan Xu; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Michael D Abràmoff; Kyungmoo Lee; Meindert Niemeijer; Wallace L M Alward; Emily C Greenlee; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka; Young H Kwon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kyungmoo Lee; Meindert Niemeijer; Mona K Garvin; Young H Kwon; Milan Sonka; Michael D Abramoff Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Juan Xu; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Jamie E Craig; David A Mackey; Alex W Hewitt; Joel S Schuman Journal: Opt Express Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 3.894