Literature DB >> 18326522

Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields.

C-H Juan1, N G Muggleton, O J L Tzeng, D L Hung, A Cowey, V Walsh.   

Abstract

The premotor theory of attention suggests that target processing and generation of a saccade to the target are interdependent. Temporally precise transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered over the human frontal eye fields, the area most frequently associated with the premotor theory in association with eye movements, while subjects performed a visually instructed pro-/antisaccade task. Visual analysis and saccade preparation were clearly separated in time, as indicated by 2 distinct time points of TMS delivery that resulted in elevated saccade latencies. These results show that visual analysis and saccade preparation, although frequently enacted together, are dissociable processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18326522      PMCID: PMC2536703          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  26 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of visual search: regional segregations within the frontal eye fields and effective connectivity of the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Darren R Gitelman; Todd B Parrish; Karl J Friston; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study.

Authors:  L M Stewart; V Walsh; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Feedback to V1: a reverse hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Chi-Hung Juan; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Grosbras; Tomás Paus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field.

Authors:  Takashi R Sato; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm.

Authors:  Bettina Olk; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-01-20       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Locating the human frontal eye fields with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Human frontal eye fields and visual search.

Authors:  Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Prosaccades and antisaccades to onsets and color singletons: evidence that erroneous prosaccades are not reflexive.

Authors:  Richard Godijn; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  28 in total

1.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Philip Tseng; Wei-Kuang Liang; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Antisaccade cost is modulated by contextual experience of location probability.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Liu; Hui-Yan Chiau; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J L Tzeng; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: evidence for a perceptual gap effect.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Trial type probability modulates the cost of antisaccades.

Authors:  Hui-Yan Chiau; Philip Tseng; Jia-Han Su; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dissociating the contributions of human frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex to visual search.

Authors:  Neil G Muggleton; Roger Kalla; Chi-Hung Juan; V Walsh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Exploring the contributions of the supplementary eye field to subliminal inhibition using double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hui-Yan Chiau; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of visuospatial attentional control.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-10-29

9.  Visual and motor connectivity and the distribution of calcium-binding proteins in macaque frontal eye field: implications for saccade target selection.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Iwona Stepniewska; Erin A Crowder; Melanie W Leslie; Erik E Emeric; Matthew J Nelson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  The human frontal oculomotor cortical areas contribute asymmetrically to motor planning in a gap saccade task.

Authors:  Paul van Donkelaar; Yu Lin; David Hewlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.