Literature DB >> 11164880

Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study.

L M Stewart1, V Walsh, J C Rothwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the stability of visual phosphene thresholds and to assess whether they correlate with motor thresholds.
BACKGROUND: Currently, motor threshold is used as an index of cortical sensitivity so that in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments, intensity can be set at a given percentage of this value. It is not known whether this is a reasonable index of cortical sensitivity in non-motor and hence whether it should be used in experiments where other cortical areas are targeted. Previous studies have indicated that phosphene threshold might be a suitable alternative in TMS studies of the visual system.
METHOD: Using single pulse TMS visual phosphene and motor thresholds were measured in 15 subjects. Both thresholds were retested in seven of these subjects a week later. RESULT: Visual phosphene thresholds, though stable within subjects across the two sessions, showed greater variability than motor thresholds. There was no correlation between the two measures.
CONCLUSION: TMS motor thresholds cannot be assumed to be a guide to visual cortex excitability and by extension are probably an inappropriate guide to the cortical excitability of other non-motor areas of the brain. Phosphene thresholds are proposed as a potential standard for inter-individual comparison in visual TMS experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11164880     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00130-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  87 in total

1.  Extrageniculate mediation of unconscious vision in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced blindsight.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Dominique Shelton; Olivia L Lee; Erik Chang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Sven Bestmann; Vincent Walsh; Kai V Thilo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Parameterization of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Michael T Rubens; Theodore P Zanto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Philip Tseng; Wei-Kuang Liang; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Effects of cerebellar stimulation on processing semantic associations.

Authors:  Giorgos P Argyropoulos; Neil G Muggleton
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Dissociation of the rostral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning in saccades: a TMS investigation.

Authors:  M R Burke; R O Coats
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Sarah C Krall; Lukas J Volz; Eileen Oberwelland; Christian Grefkes; Gereon R Fink; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Determination of motor threshold using visual observation overestimates transcranial magnetic stimulation dosage: safety implications.

Authors:  Gregory G Westin; Bruce D Bassi; Sarah H Lisanby; Bruce Luber
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.