Literature DB >> 19916006

Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: evidence for a perceptual gap effect.

Lynn Huestegge1, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

Temporal gaps between the offset of a central fixation stimulus and the onset of an eccentric target typically reduce saccade latencies (saccadic gap effect). Here, we test whether temporal gaps also affect perceptual performance in peripheral vision. In Experiment 1, subjects executed saccades to briefly presented peripheral target letters and reported letter identity afterwards. A central fixation stimulus either remained visible throughout the trial (overlap) or disappeared 200 ms before letter onset (gap). Experiment 2 tested perceptual performance without saccade execution, whereas Experiment 3 tested saccade execution without perceptual demands. Peripheral letter perception performance was enhanced in gap as compared to overlap conditions (perceptual gap effect) irrespective of concurrent oculomotor demands. Furthermore, the saccadic gap effect was modulated by concurrent perceptual demands. Experiment 4 ruled out a general warning explanation of the perceptual gap effect. These findings extend recent theories assuming a strong coupling between the preparation of goal-directed saccades and shifts of visual attention from the spatial to the temporal domain.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19916006     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2080-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: overlapping neural systems.

Authors:  A C Nobre; D R Gitelman; E C Dias; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention.

Authors:  Alla Ignashchenkova; Peter W Dicke; Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Attentional modulation of the gap effect.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Clara M Lajonchere; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Parietal damage dissociates saccade planning from presaccadic perceptual facilitation.

Authors:  A Z Khan; A Blangero; Y Rossetti; R Salemme; J Luauté; H Deubel; W X Schneider; N Laverdure; G Rode; D Boisson; L Pisella
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: saccades can be accurate.

Authors:  Z Kapoula; D A Robinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Organization of monkey superior colliculus: enhanced visual response of superficial layer cells.

Authors:  R H Wurtz; C W Mohler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Action effects in saccade control.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Magali Kreutzfeldt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Action and perception are temporally coupled by a common mechanism that leads to a timing misperception.

Authors:  Elena Pretegiani; Corina Astefanoaei; Pierre M Daye; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Dorina-Emilia Creanga; Alessandra Rufa; Lance M Optican
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Oculomotor interference during manual response preparation: evidence from the response-cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Jos J Adam
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control.

Authors:  Jens Kürten; Tim Raettig; Julian Gutzeit; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-04-08

6.  Gaze interaction: anticipation-based control of the gaze of others.

Authors:  Eva Riechelmann; Tim Raettig; Anne Böckler; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-25

7.  Testing predictions of a neural process model of visual attention in infancy across competitive and non-competitive contexts.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Shannon Ross-Sheehy; Bret Eschman
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2022-02-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.