Literature DB >> 12419133

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.

Marie-Hélène Grosbras1, Tomás Paus.   

Abstract

When looking at one object, human subjects can shift their attention to another object in their visual field without moving the eyes. Such shifts of attention activate the same brain regions as those involved in the execution of eye movements. Here we investigate the role of one of the main cortical oculomotor area, namely, the frontal eye field (FEF), in shifts of attention. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a technique known to disrupt transiently eye-movements preparation. We hypothesized that if the FEF is a necessary element in the network involved in shifting attention without moving the eyes, then#10; TMS should also disrupt visuospatial attention. For each volunteer, we positioned the TMS coil over the probabilistic anatomical location of the FEF, and we verified that single pulses delayed eye movements. We then applied TMS during a visuospatial attention task. In this task, a central arrow directed shifts of attention and the subject responded by a keypress to a subsequent visual peripheral target without moving the eyes from the central fixation point. In a few trials, the cue was invalid or uninformative, yielding slower responses than when the cue was valid. We delivered single pulses either 53 msec before or 70 msec after target onset. Contrary to our prediction, the main effect of the stimulation was a decrease in reaction time when it was applied 53 msec before target onset. TMS over the left hemisphere facilitated responses to targets in the right hemifield only and for all cueing conditions, whereas TMS over the right hemisphere had a bilateral effect for valid and neutral but not invalid cueing. Thus, TMS interfered with shift of attention only in the case of right hemisphere stimulation: it increased the cost of invalid cueing. Our results suggest that TMS over the FEF facilitates visual detection, and thereby reduces reaction time. This finding provides new insights into the role of the human FEF in processing visual information. The functional asymmetry observed for both facilitation of visual detection and interference with shifts of attention provides further evidence for the dominance of the right hemisphere for those processes. Our results also underline that the disruptive or facilitative effect of TMS over a given region depends upon the behavioral context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12419133     DOI: 10.1162/089892902320474553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  66 in total

1.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation to right parietal cortex modifies the attentional blink.

Authors:  Adam C G Cooper; Glyn W Humphreys; Johan Hulleman; Peter Praamstra; Mark Georgeson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Philip Tseng; Wei-Kuang Liang; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Connectivity-based parcellation: Critique and implications.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Bertrand Thirion; Gaël Varoquaux; Danilo Bzdok
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances working memory.

Authors:  Yasaman Bagherzadeh; Anahita Khorrami; Mohammad Reza Zarrindast; Seyed Vahid Shariat; Dimitrios Pantazis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Common neural mechanisms supporting spatial working memory, attention and motor intention.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field.

Authors:  Kirk G Thompson; Keri L Biscoe; Takashi R Sato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation.

Authors:  Chi-Hung Juan; Stephanie M Shorter-Jacobi; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach.

Authors:  Tomás Paus
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.