Literature DB >> 27611342

Exploring the contributions of the supplementary eye field to subliminal inhibition using double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Hui-Yan Chiau1,2, Neil G Muggleton1,3,4, Chi-Hung Juan1.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the supplementary eye fields (SEF) are involved in the control of voluntary eye movements. However, recent evidence suggests that SEF may also be important for unconscious and involuntary motor processes. Indeed, Sumner et al. ([2007]: Neuron 54:697-711) showed that patients with micro-lesions of the SEF demonstrated an absence of subliminal inhibition as evoked by masked-prime stimuli. Here, we used double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy volunteers to investigate the role of SEF in subliminal priming. We applied double-pulse TMS at two time windows in a masked-prime task: the first during an early phase, 20-70 ms after the onset of the mask but before target presentation, during which subliminal inhibition is present; and the second during a late phase, 20-70 ms after target onset, during which the saccade is being prepared. We found no effect of TMS with the early time window of stimulation, whereas a reduction in the benefit of an incompatible subliminal prime stimulus was found when SEF TMS was applied at the late time window. These findings suggest that there is a role for SEF related to the effects of subliminal primes on eye movements, but the results do not support a role in inhibiting the primed tendency. Hum Brain Mapp 38:339-351, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  negative compatibility effect; subliminal inhibition; supplementary eye field; transcranial magnetic stimulation; unconscious

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27611342      PMCID: PMC6867021          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  101 in total

1.  Behavioural conditions affecting saccadic eye movements elicited electrically from the frontal lobes of primates.

Authors:  E J Tehovnik; W M Slocum; P H Schiller
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  The detection of visual signals by macaque frontal eye field during masking.

Authors:  K G Thompson; J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study.

Authors:  M F S Rushworth; K A Hadland; T Paus; P K Sipila
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  C-H Juan; N G Muggleton; O J L Tzeng; D L Hung; A Cowey; V Walsh
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Intention, choice, and the medial frontal cortex.

Authors:  Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Unconscious vision and executive control: how unconscious processing and conscious action control interact.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Wilfried Kunde; Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-06-22

Review 7.  One version of direct response priming requires automatization of the relevant associations but not awareness of the prime.

Authors:  Stuart T Klapp
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-08-29

Review 8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  V Walsh; A Cowey
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Human frontal eye fields and visual search.

Authors:  Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action.

Authors:  Petroc Sumner; Parashkev Nachev; Peter Morris; Andrew M Peters; Stephen R Jackson; Christopher Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  2 in total

1.  How to Test the Association Between Baseline Performance Level and the Modulatory Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Luigi Cattaneo; Giulio Costantini
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  On the Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): How Brain State and Baseline Performance Level Determine Behavioral Effects of TMS.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Silvia Bona; Marco Marelli; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.