Literature DB >> 12765614

Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field.

Takashi R Sato1, Jeffrey D Schall.   

Abstract

We investigated the neural basis of visual and saccade selection in the frontal eye field of macaque monkeys using a singleton search task with prosaccade or antisaccade responses. Two types of neurons were distinguished. The first initially selected the singleton even in antisaccade trials, although most subsequently selected the endpoint of the saccade. The time the singleton was located was not affected by stimulus-response compatibility and did not vary with reaction time across trials. The second type of neuron selected only the endpoint of the saccade. The time of endpoint selection by these neurons accounted for most of the effect of stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time. These results indicate that visual selection and saccade selection are different processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12765614     DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00237-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  104 in total

1.  Effect of target-distractor similarity on FEF visual selection in the absence of the target.

Authors:  Takashi R Sato; Katsumi Watanabe; Kirk G Thompson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience.

Authors:  Kirk G Thompson; Narcisse P Bichot; Takashi R Sato
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Saccade performance in the nasal and temporal hemifields.

Authors:  Omar I Jóhannesson; Arni Gunnar Asgeirsson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural correlates of correct and errant attentional selection revealed through N2pc and frontal eye field activity.

Authors:  Richard P Heitz; Jeremiah Y Cohen; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Motor output evoked by subsaccadic stimulation of primate frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Brian D Corneil; James K Elsley; Benjamin Nagy; Sharon L Cushing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Task dependence of decision- and choice-related activity in monkey oculomotor thalamus.

Authors:  M Gabriela Costello; Dantong Zhu; Paul J May; Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field.

Authors:  Kirk G Thompson; Keri L Biscoe; Takashi R Sato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation.

Authors:  Chi-Hung Juan; Stephanie M Shorter-Jacobi; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Neural correlates of attention and distractibility in the lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.