Literature DB >> 18319147

Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.

Suzanne Bartle-Haring1, Paula Toviessi, Heather Katafiasz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the decision to obtain individualized risk assessment (IRA) after a breast cancer education session.
METHODS: A sample of both African American and Caucasian women was used to determine if there were differences by race/ethnicity in uptake of the assessment and differences in the variables that were most predictive of uptake. The sample included 166 women between the ages of 18 and 80. Sixty-two percent of the sample were African American women. KEY
FINDINGS: The results suggested that African American women and Caucasian women used different factors and used other factors differently to decide whether or not to obtain an IRA. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results are discussed within the context of health disparities among ethnic minority and Caucasian women with implications for breast cancer control programs. The results of this study suggest that knowledge alone does not lead to opting for a personalized risk assessment, and that African American and Caucasian women use different pieces of information, or information differently to make decision about getting more personalized information about risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18319147      PMCID: PMC2276320          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  25 in total

1.  Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications.

Authors:  Caryn Lerman; Robert T Croyle; Kenneth P Tercyak; Heidi Hamann
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

2.  A breast cancer education and on-site screening intervention for unscreened African American women.

Authors:  Rosalie F Young; John B Waller; Herbert Smitherman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Lay Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Inherited Diseases.

Authors:  J S Shaw; K L Bassi
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07

4.  Development of a knowledge scale about breast cancer and heredity (BCHK).

Authors:  N Ondrusek; E Warner; V Goel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Some problems with social cognition models: a pragmatic and conceptual analysis.

Authors:  Jane Ogden
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.

Authors:  S M Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-02

Review 7.  Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management.

Authors:  S M Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Intention to have a mammogram in the future among women who have underused mammography in the past.

Authors:  J D Allen; G Sorensen; A M Stoddard; G Colditz; K Peterson
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  1998-08

10.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; S M Miller; M Daly; C Sands; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  4 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Low-Income Women of Color in Primary Care: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Silvia Tejeda; Kimberly Childers; Melinda R Stolley; Richard B Warnecke; Kent F Hoskins
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

3.  A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Eileen Keenan; Karen Ruth; Karthik Devarajan; Michelle Rodoletz; Eric J Bieber
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Individual breast cancer risk assessment in underserved populations: integrating empirical bioethics and health disparities research.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Kent Hoskins
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.