Literature DB >> 8625088

Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management.

S M Miller1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two main psychologic coping styles for dealing with cancer and other health threats have been identified: monitoring (attending to) or blunting (avoiding) potentially threatening information. This article reviews results and implications from this research relevant to cancer screening and management.
METHODS: The Monitor-Blunter Style Scale has been used extensively to assess and categorize patients with regard to these coping styles to predict their differential responses to various cancer-related screening and management regimens.
RESULTS: Patients characterized by a monitoring coping style generally are more concerned and distressed about their cancer risk, experience greater treatment side effects, are more knowledgeable about their medical situation, and are less satisfied with and more demanding about the psychosocial aspects of their care. They also prefer a more passive role in clinical decision making, are more adherent to medical recommendations, and manifest greater psychologic morbidity in response to cancer-related threats.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients fare better (psychologically, behaviorally, and physiologically) when the information they receive about their medical condition is tailored to their own coping styles: generally those with a monitoring style tend to do better when given more information, and those with a blunting style do better with less information. However, patients with a monitoring style who are pessimistic about their future or who face long term, intensely threatening, and uncontrollable medical situations may require not just more information, but also, more emotional support to help them deal with their disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8625088     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<167::aid-cncr2820760203>3.0.co;2-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  122 in total

Review 1.  Communication in advanced disease.

Authors:  S B LeGrand
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Web portals and patient information-seeking behaviors.

Authors:  Robert Miller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  The impact of misclassification due to survey response fatigue on estimation and identifiability of treatment effects.

Authors:  Brian L Egleston; Suzanne M Miller; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Follow-up care for young adult survivors of cancer: lessons from pediatrics.

Authors:  Christine Eiser; Kate Absolom; Diana Greenfield; John Snowden; Robert Coleman; Barry Hancock; Helena Davies
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Meeting the information needs of lower income cancer survivors: results of a randomized control trial evaluating the american cancer society's "I can cope".

Authors:  Michelle Y Martin; Mary B Evans; Polly Kratt; Lori A Pollack; Judith Lee Smith; Robert Oster; Mark Dignan; Heather Prayor-Patterson; Christopher Watson; Peter Houston; Shiquina Andrews; Amandiy Liwo; Tung Sung Tseng; Sandral Hullett; Joann Oliver; Maria Pisu
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014-01-16

8.  Evaluation of the efficacy and usability of NCI's Facing Forward booklet in the cancer community setting.

Authors:  Joanne S Buzaglo; Suzanne M Miller; Jeffery Kendall; Annette L Stanton; Kuang-Yi Wen; John Scarpato; Fang Zhu; Jennifer Lyle; Julia Rowland
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Barriers to obtaining diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease among veterans.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Leslie R M Hausmann; Said Ibrahim
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Development and evaluation of an information booklet for adult survivors of cancer in childhood. The United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Late Effects Group.

Authors:  A Blacklay; C Eiser; A Ellis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.