Literature DB >> 23124498

Individual breast cancer risk assessment in underserved populations: integrating empirical bioethics and health disparities research.

Emily E Anderson1, Kent Hoskins.   

Abstract

Research suggests that individual breast cancer risk assessment may improve adherence to recommended screening and prevention guidelines, thereby decreasing morbidity and mortality. Further research on the use of risk assessment models in underserved minority populations is critical to informing national public health efforts to eliminate breast cancer disparities. However, implementing individual breast cancer risk assessment in underserved patient populations raises particular ethical issues that require further examination. After reviewing these issues, we will discuss how empirical bioethics research can be integrated with health disparities research to inform the translation of research findings. Our in-progress National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded study, How Do Underserved Minority Women Think About Breast Cancer?, conducted in the context of a larger study on individual breast cancer risk assessment, is presented as a model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23124498      PMCID: PMC3826177          DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  58 in total

1.  Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul D P Pharoah; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Bruce A J Ponder
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Opportunities and strategies for breast cancer prevention through risk reduction.

Authors:  Martin C Mahoney; Therese Bevers; Eleni Linos; Walter C Willett
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Cancer statistics, 2008.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Taylor Murray; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ralph J Coates; Robert J Uhler; Nancy Breen; Florence Tangka; Kate M Shaw
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ward; Michael Halpern; Nicole Schrag; Vilma Cokkinides; Carol DeSantis; Priti Bandi; Rebecca Siegel; Andrew Stewart; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Bartle-Haring; Paula Toviessi; Heather Katafiasz
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

7.  Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Joseph P Costantino; David Pee; Melissa Bondy; Lisa Newman; Mano Selvan; Garnet L Anderson; Kathleen E Malone; Polly A Marchbanks; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Sandra A Norman; Michael S Simon; Robert Spirtas; Giske Ursin; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Janice L Berliner; Angela Musial Fay
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.717

9.  Grand challenges in global health: the ethical, social and cultural program.

Authors:  Peter A Singer; Andrew D Taylor; Abdallah S Daar; Ross E G Upshur; Jerome A Singh; James V Lavery
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Stephen Taplin; Linn Abraham; William E Barlow; Joshua J Fenton; Eric A Berns; Patricia A Carney; Gary R Cutter; Edward A Sickles; D'Orsi Carl; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  6 in total

1.  Views of Low-Income Women of Color at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Silvia Tejada; Richard B Warnecke; Kent Hoskins
Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth       Date:  2018

2.  Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Low-Income Women of Color in Primary Care: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Silvia Tejeda; Kimberly Childers; Melinda R Stolley; Richard B Warnecke; Kent F Hoskins
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Acceptability of an Interactive Computer-Animated Agent to Promote Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density: a Mixed Method Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christine Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Timothy Bickmore; Mark Kennedy; Margaret F Hopkins; Michael D C Fishman; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Erica T Warner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers' Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Amy Fitzpatrick; Sarah Waugh; Michelle Carrera; Nancy R Kressin; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Nancy R Kressin; Mara A Schonberg; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Organizational readiness to implement population-based screening and genetic service delivery for hereditary cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  Sarah Knerr; Kathleen M West; Frank A Angelo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.