Literature DB >> 8681923

A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

C Lerman1, M D Schwartz, S M Miller, M Daly, C Sands, B K Rimer.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated the impact of individualized breast cancer risk counseling (BCRC) on breast-cancer-specific distress and general distress in 239 women with a family history of breast cancer. Following a baseline assessment of demographics, risk factors, coping styles, and distress, participants were assigned randomly to receive either BCRC or general health education (GHE; i.e., control group). After controlling for education level, women who received BCRC had significantly less breast-cancer-specific distress at 3-month follow-up compared with women who received GHE. A significant Education Level x Treatment Group interaction indicated that the psychological benefits of BCRC were greater for women with less formal education. In both the BCRC and GHE groups, participants who had monitoring coping styles exhibited increases in general distress from baseline to follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8681923     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.15.2.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  40 in total

1.  Presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: how distressing are the pre-test weeks? Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Working Group.

Authors:  L N Lodder; P G Frets; R W Trijsburg; E J Meijers-Heijboer; J G Klijn; H J Duivenvoorden; A Tibben; A Wagner; C A van der Meer; P Devilee; C J Cornelisse; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristen S Willard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-04

3.  A model of disease-specific worry in heritable disease: the influence of family history, perceived risk and worry about other illnesses.

Authors:  Terry A DiLorenzo; Julie Schnur; Guy H Montgomery; Joel Erblich; Gary Winkel; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-02-10

4.  Psychosocial conditions of women awaiting genetic counseling: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Lone Sunde; Christoffer Johansen; Søren P Johnsen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  A descriptive study of breast cancer worry.

Authors:  K D McCaul; A D Branstetter; S M O'Donnell; K Jacobson; K B Quinlan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-12

7.  Subjective and Objective Risks of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation in Individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish Descent.

Authors:  Kimberly Kelly; Howard Leventhal; Deborah Toppmeyer; Judy Much; James Dermody; Monica Marvin; Jill Baran; Marvin Schwalb
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 9.  [Value of breast MRI as supplement to mammography and sonography for high risk breast cancer patients].

Authors:  T Schlossbauer; K Hellerhoff; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.