Literature DB >> 22049389

Lay Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Inherited Diseases.

J S Shaw1, K L Bassi.   

Abstract

One of the most important issues facing legal and medical policy makers in the coming years will be whether to employ populationbased testing for genetic markers of inherited diseases. Two hundred and twenty-six randomly selected individuals from Easton, Pennsylvania completed a mail questionnaire that was designed to assess the general public's attitudes toward many of the personal and societal issues surrounding genetic testing for disease susceptibility. Respondents were generally optimistic about the potential benefits of genetic testing, and their attitudes about genetic testing were associated with their personal interest in getting a genetic test. Respondents were more likely to be interested in undergoing genetic testing for disease susceptibility if they might have some control over the targeted disease (i.e. there was a cure) and if the test was highly predictive of their chances of developing the disease. Respondents were wary of granting access to genetic testing results to anyone other than doctors and family members, and they did not want the government, religious leaders, or the courts involved in regulating genetic testing. These results have important implications for psychologists, genetic scientists, bioethicists, and legal scholars who are grappling with the many issues related to population-based genetic testing for inherited diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 22049389     DOI: 10.1177/135910530100600404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  16 in total

1.  "If It Helps, It's Worth a Try": an Investigation of Perceptions and Attitudes about Genetic Counseling among Southern Manitoba Hutterites.

Authors:  Amber P Gemmell; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian MacFarlane; Rachel Riesgraf; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.

Authors:  Kerry Sherman; Laura-Kate Shaw; Katrina Champion; Fernanda Caldeira; Margaret McCaskill
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-27

3.  Predictors of uptake of obesity genetic testing among affected adults.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Marcia Polansky; Pamela Sankar
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  A novel approach to screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in a large public venue.

Authors:  Megan Campbell; Jessa Humanki; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-11-26

5.  Effect of genomics-related literacy on non-communicable diseases.

Authors:  Sho Nakamura; Hiroto Narimatsu; Kayoko Katayama; Ri Sho; Takashi Yoshioka; Akira Fukao; Takamasa Kayama
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Opinions, hopes and concerns regarding pharmacogenomics: a comparison of healthy individuals, heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  K Lachance; S Korol; E O'Meara; A Ducharme; N Racine; M Liszkowski; J L Rouleau; G B Pelletier; M Carrier; M White; S de Denus
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Perceptions and Attitudes About Genetic Counseling Among Residents of a Midwestern Rural Area.

Authors:  Rachel J Riesgraf; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Christopher H Wade; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Predictive value of breast cancer cognitions and attitudes toward genetic testing on women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Frauke Reitz; Jürgen Barth; Jürgen Bengel
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2004-07-01

10.  Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.