Literature DB >> 12556062

A breast cancer education and on-site screening intervention for unscreened African American women.

Rosalie F Young1, John B Waller, Herbert Smitherman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study tested a breast cancer education intervention for African American women with poor screening histories. Disparities in rates of later-stage disease and death may be related to lower screening rates due to behavioral (e.g., knowledge gap) and structural (e.g., access) barriers.
METHODS: 94 African American women (low-income, poor screening histories) were randomly assigned for an educational and on-site screening intervention, or non-intervention status. Primary care sites were used for educational purposes. Three-month post-intervention mammography was assessed.
RESULTS: The intervention group had significantly higher screening rates than the non-intervention group. The latter had a knowledge gap, poor screening history, cancer fears, and insurance differences relative to the screened women. Screening was predicted by behavioral, rather than structural factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Since low-income African American women face behavioral and structural barriers to breast cancer screening, an educational program that improves knowledge levels and is offered in primary care sites can effectively impact screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12556062     DOI: 10.1080/08858190209528844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  11 in total

Review 1.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Cancer knowledge increases after a brief intervention among Arab Americans in Michigan.

Authors:  Florence J Dallo; Tabitha Zakar; Luisa N Borrell; Monty Fakhouri; Hikmet Jamil
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of interventions to promote mammography among ethnic minority women.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Jong-Eun Lee; Jiyun Kim; Haley K Hedlin; Heejung Song; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Do cultural factors predict mammography behaviour among Korean immigrants in the USA?

Authors:  Hanju Lee; Jiyun Kim; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  How old are African American women when they receive their first mammogram? Results from a church-based study.

Authors:  Janice V Bowie; Anita M Wells; Hee-Soon Juon; Kim D Sydnor; Elisa M Rodriguez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-08

6.  Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low?

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey May Kuo; Laurel J Clayton; W Douglas Evans
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Effectiveness of Interventions for Breast Cancer Screening in African American Women: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Valire Carr Copeland; Yoo Jung Kim; Shaun M Eack
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Bartle-Haring; Paula Toviessi; Heather Katafiasz
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  Evaluating outcomes of community-based cancer education interventions: a 10-year review of studies.

Authors:  Alexandria Booker; Vanessa L Malcarne; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 10.  Interventions to increase the uptake of mammography amongst low income women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Gardner; Abbey Adams; Mona Jeffreys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.