Literature DB >> 18306000

Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers.

Tingting Mu1, Asoke K Nandi, Rangaraj M Rangayyan.   

Abstract

Breast masses due to benign disease and malignant tumors related to breast cancer differ in terms of shape, edge-sharpness, and texture characteristics. In this study, we evaluate a set of 22 features including 5 shape factors, 3 edge-sharpness measures, and 14 texture features computed from 111 regions in mammograms, with 46 regions related to malignant tumors and 65 to benign masses. Feature selection is performed by a genetic algorithm based on several criteria, such as alignment of the kernel with the target function, class separability, and normalized distance. Fisher's linear discriminant analysis, the support vector machine (SVM), and our strict two-surface proximal (S2SP) classifier, as well as their corresponding kernel-based nonlinear versions, are used in the classification task with the selected features. The nonlinear classification performance of kernel Fisher's discriminant analysis, SVM, and S2SP, with the Gaussian kernel, reached 0.95 in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. The results indicate that improvement in classification accuracy may be gained by using selected combinations of shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18306000      PMCID: PMC3043867          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9102-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  26 in total

Review 1.  Classifying mammographic mass shapes using the wavelet transform modulus-maxima method.

Authors:  L M Bruce; R R Adhami
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses.

Authors:  R M Rangayyan; N R Mudigonda; J E Desautels
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Classification of breast masses in mammograms using genetic programming and feature selection.

Authors:  R J Nandi; A K Nandi; R M Rangayyan; D Scutt
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Thanh M Nguyen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Classification of breast masses via nonlinear transformation of features based on a kernel matrix.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  A novel breast tissue density classification methodology.

Authors:  A Oliver; J Freixenet; R Martí; J Pont; E Pérez; E R E Denton; R Zwiggelaar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2008-01

8.  Strict 2-Surface Proximal Classification of Knee-joint Vibroarthrographic Signals.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Breast image registration techniques: a survey.

Authors:  Yujun Guo; Radhika Sivaramakrishna; Cheng-Chang Lu; Jasjit S Suri; Swamy Laxminarayan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Improved dynamic-programming-based algorithms for segmentation of masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Alfonso Rojas Domínguez; Asoke K Nandi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of analytical mathematical approaches for identifying key nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy biomarkers in the diagnosis and assessment of clinical change of diseases.

Authors:  Jason B Nikas; C Dirk Keene; Walter C Low
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Effect of pixel resolution on texture features of breast masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Thanh M Nguyen; Fábio J Ayres; Asoke K Nandi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Megan Rakoczy; Donald McGaughey; Michael J Korenberg; Jacob Levman; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Prediction by Mammographic Radiomic Features.

Authors:  Wenjuan Ma; Yumei Zhao; Yu Ji; Xinpeng Guo; Xiqi Jian; Peifang Liu; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Automatic detection and classification of breast tumors in ultrasonic images using texture and morphological features.

Authors:  Yanni Su; Yuanyuan Wang; Jing Jiao; Yi Guo
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2011-07-27

7.  Dependence of Shape-Based Descriptors and Mass Segmentation Areas on Initial Contour Placement Using the Chan-Vese Method on Digital Mammograms.

Authors:  S N Acho; W I D Rae
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 8.  Could magnetic resonance provide in vivo histology?

Authors:  Marco Dominietto; Markus Rudin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Optimization of Network Topology in Computer-Aided Detection Schemes Using Phased Searching with NEAT in a Time-Scaled Framework.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-10-13

10.  Dynamic graph cut based segmentation of mammogram.

Authors:  S Pitchumani Angayarkanni; Nadira Banu Kamal; Ranjit Jeba Thangaiya
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.