Literature DB >> 22828783

Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Megan Rakoczy1, Donald McGaughey, Michael J Korenberg, Jacob Levman, Anne L Martel.   

Abstract

The accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for early detection and classification of breast cancer in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is dependent upon the features used by the CAD classifier. Here, we show that fast orthogonal search (FOS), which provides a more efficient iterative manner of computing stepwise regression feature selection, can select features with predictive value from a set of kinetic and texture candidate features computed from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. FOS can in minutes search candidate feature sets of millions of terms, which may include cross-products of features up to second-, third- or fourth-order. This method is tested on a set of 83 DCE-MRI images, of which 20 are for cancerous and 63 for benign cases, using a leave-one-out trial. The features selected by FOS were used in a FOS predictor and nearest-neighbour predictor and had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.889 and 0.791 respectively. The FOS predictor AUC is significantly improved over the signal enhancement ratio predictor with an AUC of 0.706 (p = 0.0035 for the difference in the AUCs). Moreover, using FOS-selected features in a support vector machine increased the AUC over that resulting when the features were manually selected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22828783      PMCID: PMC3597958          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9506-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  23 in total

1.  Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Invariant error metrics for image reconstruction.

Authors:  J R Fienup
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1997-11-10       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines.

Authors:  J Levman; T Leung; P Causer; D Plewes; A L Martel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets.

Authors:  C E Metz; B A Herman; C A Roe
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast.

Authors:  Botond K Szabó; Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg; Beata Boné; Peter Aspelin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses in Breast DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Emi Honda; Ryohei Nakayama; Hitoshi Koyama; Akiyoshi Yamashita
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Tensor based multichannel reconstruction for breast tumours identification from DCE-MRIs.

Authors:  X-X Yin; S Hadjiloucas; J-H Chen; Y Zhang; J-L Wu; M-Y Su
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Development of a Longitudinal Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Intelligent Clinical Decision-Making Scheme.

Authors:  Chin-Chuan Shih; Ssu-Han Chen; Gin-Den Chen; Chi-Chang Chang; Yu-Lin Shih
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.