Literature DB >> 19756865

Effect of pixel resolution on texture features of breast masses in mammograms.

Rangaraj M Rangayyan1, Thanh M Nguyen, Fábio J Ayres, Asoke K Nandi.   

Abstract

The effect of pixel resolution on texture features computed using the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) was analyzed in the task of discriminating mammographic breast lesions as benign masses or malignant tumors. Regions in mammograms related to 111 breast masses, including 65 benign masses and 46 malignant tumors, were analyzed at pixel sizes of 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 μm. Classification experiments using each texture feature individually provided accuracy, in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), of up to 0.72. Using the Bayesian classifier and the leave-one-out method, the AUC obtained was in the range 0.73 to 0.75 for the pixel resolutions of 200 to 800 μm, with 14 GLCM-based texture features using adaptive ribbons of pixels around the boundaries of the masses. Texture features computed using the ribbons resulted in higher classification accuracy than the same features computed using the corresponding regions within the mass boundaries. The t test was applied to AUC values obtained using 100 repetitions of random splitting of the texture features from the ribbons of masses into the training and testing sets. The texture features computed with the pixel size of 200 μm provided the highest average AUC with statistically highly significant differences as compared to all of the other pixel sizes tested, except 100 μm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19756865      PMCID: PMC3046677          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9238-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

1.  Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses.

Authors:  N R Mudigonda; R M Rangayyan; J E Desautels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; L M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Radhika Sivaramakrishna; Kimerly A Powell; Michael L Lieber; William A Chilcote; Raj Shekhar
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Classification of breast masses in mammograms using genetic programming and feature selection.

Authors:  R J Nandi; A K Nandi; R M Rangayyan; D Scutt
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Classification of breast masses via nonlinear transformation of features based on a kernel matrix.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.

Authors:  Shalini Gupta; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.

Authors:  N R Mudigonda; R M Rangayyan; J E Desautels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Automatic Detection of Masses in Mammograms Using Quality Threshold Clustering, Correlogram Function, and SVM.

Authors:  Joberth de Nazaré Silva; Antonio Oseas de Carvalho Filho; Aristófanes Corrêa Silva; Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva; Marcelo Gattass
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Li Lin; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Automatic detection of anomalies in screening mammograms.

Authors:  Edward J Kendall; Michael G Barnett; Krista Chytyk-Praznik
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 4.  Multi-scale characterizations of colon polyps via computed tomographic colonography.

Authors:  Weiguo Cao; Marc J Pomeroy; Yongfeng Gao; Matthew A Barish; Almas F Abbasi; Perry J Pickhardt; Zhengrong Liang
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2019-12-27

Review 5.  Breast Cancer Segmentation Methods: Current Status and Future Potentials.

Authors:  Epimack Michael; He Ma; Hong Li; Frank Kulwa; Jing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.