Literature DB >> 18270037

A novel breast tissue density classification methodology.

A Oliver1, J Freixenet, R Martí, J Pont, E Pérez, E R E Denton, R Zwiggelaar.   

Abstract

It has been shown that the accuracy of mammographic abnormality detection methods is strongly dependent on the breast tissue characteristics, where a dense breast drastically reduces detection sensitivity. In addition, breast tissue density is widely accepted to be an important risk indicator for the development of breast cancer. Here, we describe the development of an automatic breast tissue classification methodology, which can be summarized in a number of distinct steps: 1) the segmentation of the breast area into fatty versus dense mammographic tissue; 2) the extraction of morphological and texture features from the segmented breast areas; and 3) the use of a Bayesian combination of a number of classifiers. The evaluation, based on a large kappa = 0.81 and 0.67 for the two data sets) between automatic and expert-based Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System mammographic density assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270037     DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2007.903514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed        ISSN: 1089-7771


  17 in total

1.  Automatic breast parenchymal density classification integrated into a CADe system.

Authors:  G Bueno; N Vállez; O Déniz; P Esteve; M A Rienda; M Arias; C Pastor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  Mario Mustra; Mislav Grgic; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy C-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography.

Authors:  Brad Keller; Diane Nathan; Yan Wang; Yuanjie Zheng; James Gee; Emily Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

4.  Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Automated identification of tumor microscopic morphology based on macroscopically measured scatter signatures.

Authors:  Pilar Beatriz Garcia-Allende; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; P Jack Hoopes; Kimberley S Samkoe; Olga M Conde; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Mammographic image based breast tissue classification with kernel self-optimized fisher discriminant for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jun-Bao Li
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Brad M Keller; Shonket Ray; Yan Wang; Emily F Conant; James C Gee; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Breast Density Analysis Using an Automatic Density Segmentation Algorithm.

Authors:  Arnau Oliver; Meritxell Tortajada; Xavier Lladó; Jordi Freixenet; Sergi Ganau; Lidia Tortajada; Mariona Vilagran; Melcior Sentís; Robert Martí
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  CFS-SMO based classification of breast density using multiple texture models.

Authors:  Vipul Sharma; Sukhwinder Singh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Computerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; Xiao Hui Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.