Literature DB >> 11094803

Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses.

R M Rangayyan1, N R Mudigonda, J E Desautels.   

Abstract

The problem of computer-aided classification of benign and malignant breast masses using shape features is addressed. The aim of the study is to look at the exceptions in shapes of masses such as circumscribed malignant tumours and spiculated benign masses which are difficult to classify correctly using common shape analysis methods. The proposed methods of shape analysis treat the object's boundary in terms of local details. The boundaries of masses analysed using the proposed methods were manually drawn on mammographic images by an expert radiologist (JELD). A boundary segmentation method is used to separate major portions of the boundary and to label them as concave or convex segments. To analyse the shape information localised in each segment, features are computed through an iterative procedure for polygonal modelling of the mass boundaries. Features are based on the concavity fraction of a mass boundary and the degree of narrowness of spicules as characterised by a spiculation index. Two features comprising spiculation index (SI) and fractional concavity (fcc) developed in the present study when used in combination with the global shape feature of compactness resulted in a benign/malignant classification accuracy of 82%, with an area (Az) of 0.79 under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with a database of the boundaries of 28 benign masses and 26 malignant tumours. SI alone resulted in a classification accuracy of 80% with Az of 0.82. The combination of all the three features achieved 91% accuracy of circumscribed versus spiculated classification of masses based on shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11094803     DOI: 10.1007/BF02345742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  15 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis.

Authors:  A Petrosian; H P Chan; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt; D D Adler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; D Wei; M A Helvie; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Detection of spicules on mammogram based on skeleton analysis.

Authors:  H Kobatake; Y Yoshinaga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms.

Authors:  D Brzakovic; X M Luo; P Brzakovic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Breast lesion classification by computer and xeroradiograph.

Authors:  L V Ackerman; E E Gose
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Relation between clinical and mammographic diagnosis of breast problems and the cancer/biopsy rate.

Authors:  E E Sterns
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors.

Authors:  R M Rangayyan; N M El-Faramawy; J E Desautels; O A Alim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis.

Authors:  J Kilday; F Palmieri; M D Fox
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; R W Kouides; D E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  22 in total

1.  Classification of breast masses in mammograms using genetic programming and feature selection.

Authors:  R J Nandi; A K Nandi; R M Rangayyan; D Scutt
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Thanh M Nguyen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Classification of breast masses via nonlinear transformation of features based on a kernel matrix.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  POSTGRESQL-IE: an image-handling extension for PostgreSQL.

Authors:  Denise Guliato; Ernani V de Melo; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Robson C Soares
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Chung-Ming Lo; Jung Min Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  An improved medical decision support system to identify the breast cancer using mammogram.

Authors:  Muthusamy Suganthi; Muthusamy Madheswaran
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors.

Authors:  Denise Guliato; Juliano D de Carvalho; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Sérgio A Santiago
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  An off-lattice hybrid discrete-continuum model of tumor growth and invasion.

Authors:  Junhwan Jeon; Vito Quaranta; Peter T Cummings
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.