Literature DB >> 16929917

Breast image registration techniques: a survey.

Yujun Guo1, Radhika Sivaramakrishna, Cheng-Chang Lu, Jasjit S Suri, Swamy Laxminarayan.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Image registration plays an important role in breast cancer detection. This paper gives an overview of the current state-of-the-art in the breast image registration techniques. For the intramodality registration techniques, X-ray, MRI, and ultrasound are the primary focuses of interest. Intermodality techniques will cover the combination of different modalities. Validation of breast registration methods is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16929917     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-005-0016-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  75 in total

1.  Elastic matching of dynamic MR mammographic images.

Authors:  R Lucht; M V Knopp; G Brix
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.

Authors:  S Sanjay-Gopal; H P Chan; T Wilson; M Helvie; N Petrick; B Sahiner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A hybrid breast biopsy system combining ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  C A Piron; P Causer; R Jong; R Shumak; D B Plewes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Linear structures in mammographic images: detection and classification.

Authors:  Reyer Zwiggelaar; Susan M Astley; Caroline R M Boggis; Christopher J Taylor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Automatic registration of 3-D ultrasound images.

Authors:  R N Rohling; A H Gee; L Berman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations.

Authors:  C R Meyer; J L Boes; B Kim; P H Bland; K R Zasadny; P V Kison; K Koral; K A Frey; R L Wahl
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review.

Authors:  P B Gordon; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data.

Authors:  A Samani; J Bishop; M J Yaffe; D B Plewes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  28 in total

1.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  A Karahaliou; K Vassiou; N S Arikidis; S Skiadopoulos; T Kanavou; L Costaridou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  An expectation-maximisation approach for simultaneous pixel classification and tracer kinetic modelling in dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mario Sansone; Roberta Fusco; Antonella Petrillo; Mario Petrillo; Marcello Bracale
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Diagnosis of breast cancer in light microscopic and mammographic images textures using relative entropy via kernel estimation.

Authors:  Sevcan Aytac Korkmaz; Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz; Mustafa Poyraz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Digital image elasto-tomography: mechanical property estimation of silicone phantoms.

Authors:  Ashton Peters; J Geoffrey Chase; Elijah E W Van Houten
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Classification of breast masses via nonlinear transformation of features based on a kernel matrix.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers.

Authors:  Tingting Mu; Asoke K Nandi; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Novel electrode-skin interface for breast electrical impedance scanning.

Authors:  Zhenyu Ji; Xiuzhen Dong; Xuetao Shi; Fusheng You; Feng Fu; Ruigang Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Multilayer imaging and compositional analysis of human male breast by laser reflectometry and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  P S Pandian; M Kumaravel; Megha Singh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Anatomical landmark localization in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  X X Yin; B W-H Ng; Q Yang; A Pitman; K Ramamohanarao; D Abbott
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Jennifer L Boes; Benjamin A Hoff; Nola Hylton; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull; Anne F Schott; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Ryan Chamberlain; Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.